|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Maybe we should push the "UMDS" guys to support TS2000i.
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Baker <chrisbak@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Omega List <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Monday, March 01, 1999 6:07 PM
Subject: Re: TS 2000 Time Stamp, Omega Response
>Sounds like perhaps Omega is planning to use the primitive BMI Data Manager
provided with
>the BMI Market Center???. I tried the BMI Data manager this afternoon -
it seems
>significantly lacking in functionality compared to even the T/S 4 Server.
But this makes
>sense since BMI is in the business of providing data, not advanced Data
Servers.
>
>So I'm confused by Mark J.'s (Omega Support) statement, since I thought we
have been
>assured several times that Omega was developing their own fast and much
improved Data
>Server for T/S Version 5, which would also explain the high price Omega is
asking for T/S
>5.0.
>
>Perhaps one of us BMI users will have to order a full version T/S 5.0 to
get a 30-day
>trial and find out what we are getting.
>
>--- Chris
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jim Hill <jhill1@xxxxxxxxxx>
>To: Omega-List <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Date: Monday, March 01, 1999 1:34 PM
>Subject: TS 2000 Time Stamp, Omega Response
>
>
>>Dear Mr. Hill,
>>
>>TS 2000 will give the time stamp of the Data Provider, not the PC time.
If
>>you are using BMI, it will give you the time that is stamped from BMI's
Data
>>Manager.
>>
>>If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact us.
>>
>>Thank you,
>>Mark J.
>>Omega Research, Inc.
>>Technical Support
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jim Hill [mailto:jhill1@xxxxxxxxxx]
>><mailto:[mailto:jhill1@xxxxxxxxxx]>
>> Sent: Monday, March 01, 1999 1:31 AM
>> To: Omega - Tech Support; Carlos Pereira
>> Subject: TS 2000 ?
>>
>> Is it true that TS 2000 time stamps real time tick data via
>>the PC clock and not the time stamp used by the data source (like BMI).
If
>>so, why? The PC clock is totally unreliable, therefore, all system
testing
>>with tick data becomes unreliable.
>> thanks, jim hill
>> block 1230
>>
>
|