|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Robert,
If Clinton had told the truth, we wouldn't have spent the money.
At this point it's worth the money, if for nothing more than to teach our
young people that lying is wrong.
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert W Cummings <robert.cummings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: tagteam@xxxxxxx <tagteam@xxxxxxx>
Cc: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sunday, January 24, 1999 1:42 PM
Subject: Re: Its a weekend, joke time!!
>Most Americans understand the hard right wingers intent to get this
>president at any cost even 50 million dollars of Americans tax money.
>Wonder how many Senators are Congressmen could have with stood this type of
>investigation Starr mounted? Clinton did and they found nothing and what
>was said about that.......zero. They had to invade his personal life to
>find something. I hope the Clinton haters in the Republican party stay
>after him until their gone and ensure Gore's election. Hate always ends in
>personal destruction.
>Robert
>
>
> James F. Mazzulla wrote:
>>Dan C. wrote:
>>>.....Conservatives want to focus on the underlying principle:
>>>He lied, and that's wrong.....
>>
>>Sure lying is wrong but, as I'm sure everyone is aware, it's
>>also illegal if done while under oath. That distinction is
>>of paramount importance here and seems to get lost in the
>>shuffle from time to time.
>>
>>>....Most Americans, while accepting the principle, continue to temper it
>by looking
>>>at the particulars: He lied about sex, not about a fundamental decision
of
>>>state.:..........
>>
>>Personally, I have a hard time reconciling the fact that
>>there are people who have served (and are now serving) time
>>in prison for the same conduct in which Clinton allegedly
>>engaged. In short, most Americans seem to be unable to draw
>>a distinction between a "principle" and a "rule of law".
>>
>>Best regards,
>>Jim
>>
>>
>
>
|