[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

CPQ versus CpQ



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Since problems with CPQ/NYSE (Compaq) were discussed in a thread
in December, I thought I would post the latest from Omega, which
was in response to a follow-up inquiry I recently sent to Omega
tech support.

In response to my further question about when the patch would
be available, I got the standard answer on the Y2K patch which
all omega-list readers have seen before:

"The Company expects to offer, on or before June 30, 1999 ...."

RodX-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
Message-ID: <369BE625.F2FD770@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 18:17:41 -0600
From: "J. Rodney Grisham" <grisham@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: grisham@xxxxxxxxxxx
Organization: RevTech Industries, Inc.
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Melody Blais <Melody.Blais@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Errors in CPQ data
References: <5131CB844FF0D111840600805F8596798C91A8@xxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Melody Blais wrote:
> 
> Dear Mr. Grisham,
> 
> The problem with collecting data on CPQ is that Citicorp uses the same
> symbol, CpQ, for their preferred, Q series stock symbol.  This problem
> presented itself when Citicorp took over the symbol C, which occurred in
> early December, 1998. BMI uses the lower case p to identify preferred
> stocks.  The Omega Server is not case sensitive and as such does not
> differentiate between the upper and lower case p. When data is transmitted
> and collected for CpQ it is stored for CPQ.
> 
> Omega Research, Inc. will include a fix for this in the Year 2000 patch. The
> fix will ensure that data for lower case letter symbols will not be stored
> in upper case letter symbols.
> 
> TradeStation 2000 is case sensitive so this will not be an issue.

Thanks for the info.  That's an interesting combination of 
circumstances to cause the symptom observed.

So when can I follow CPQ (Compaq) with Tradestation?  In other
words, when will the Y2K patch be available?

Rod Grisham