[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Looking for "Cleaned" Downloadable Intraday Data.


  • To: Bob Fulks <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: Looking for "Cleaned" Downloadable Intraday Data.
  • From: "Gerrit Jacobsen" <jrt@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 23:43:27 -0500 (EST)
  • In-reply-to: <36985222.E89A95C2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Exchange data will always be dirty because it is created by humans 
- who make errors. 

1. Either the data is to dirty that you could never trade that market 
in real-time anyway then there is no point of cleaning the data and 
developing some system. The solution then is to get better data 
(real-time).

2. Or the the data is just sometimes dirty then you have to identify 
the dirt mathematically and remove it in a consistent manner 
mathematically. The way I have approached this is by using only 
filtered data for systems. Basically I use the result of this 
non-smoothing-dirt-filter as the input for the systems in real-time 
and historically. This way I know that the filtering method is 
consistent.

Gerrit Jacobsen



> At 2:09 AM -0500 1/10/99, Tony Parker wrote:
> 
> >I'm looking for a (free or subscribed) source of "Cleaned" Downloadable
> >Historical Intra-Day Data. I'm also looking for a source of "delayed"
> >"Cleaned" Intraday Data that is in a downloadable format much like the Omega
> >Research Intraday Data but is "Cleaned" of all the Bad Ticks that I find in
> >the Omega data.
> >
> >The trouble with the so-called "free" downloadable Intraday data found on
> >the Omega Research Web-Site is that it's just as "Dirty" and as full of bad
> >ticks as you get from any of the "live" RT (Signal, BMI, etc.) sources.
> >
> 
> <snip>
> 
> >
> >I spend at least two hours every night cleaning the data manually...and I
> >still get inconsistent results. There has to be another way!
> >
> >Ideas anyone?
> >
> 
> Make me wonder why you think you need clean data. If the data you get
> real-time is "dirty" (and it is), then what good is a trading system that
> only works on clean data.
> 
> Wouldn't it be more appropriate to have one that works on dirty data since
> that is what is available in real-time?
> 
> Bob Fulks
> 
>