[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: CUBS DOWN AGAIN!


  • To: Dennis Holverstott <dennis@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: CUBS DOWN AGAIN!
  • From: Gilbert Liao <gilbertl@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 09:44:17 -0500 (EST)
  • In-reply-to: <19990106145919300.AAA151@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@notebook>

PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Cubs is down again all day today Thursday Jan 7th
Gilbert.

At 08:21 AM 1/6/99 -0800, you wrote:
>> Anyone have any input on:
>> 
>> 1)      Why CUBS is down so often?
>
>Because the CME's hardware/software techs are idiots. Furthermore, the
>people at LFG are idiots for depending on this unreliable system. Sorry
>but there is no kinder way to say it.
>
>> 2)      Another Etrading broker besides LFG that DOESN'T use CUBS?
>
>Lind Online seems quite good. The software interface looks like a 1982
>DOS program but you can get used to it and their infrastructure is
>excellent.
>
>E-mini... when TOPS is working and you place an order that TOPS will
>accept, the order goes straight into TOPS/GLOBEX and your fill is
>reported in second. If TOPS is down or you want to place an order
>outside the GLOBEX limits, the order goes to a clerk with a GLOBEX
>terminal.
>
>S&P... they have the ability to use CUBS but, due to reliability
>problems with the CUBS system, have not been using it for several weeks.
>Rather, the online orders are printed out at the pit desk and flashed
>into the pit.
>
>Bottom line, at Lind unlike with LFG, the customer doesn't have to worry
>about system problems and cancel orders or change order types when the
>CME systems go down. The broker takes care of all that and, as they
>should, they make sure your orders get done one way or another. After
>all, it's THEIR job, not yours. The daily excuses and market-only
>restrictions from LFG are pure crap.
>
>-- 
>   Dennis
>