|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
jim,
thank you for your tolerance and opportunity you gave me to view this
discussion group. as i explained(tried to explain)to this audience my
initial venture into the discussion group was totally accidental. once
engaged, i tried diplomatically to exticate myself. some of the members
are real barracuda and while i had nothing("no thing") to promote other
than to clarify some of my theories, i felt that i needed to take a
shower after every joust with these guys. what an unhealthy and
unrewarding experience they make it for everyone involved. it's almost
as if their mission is not to learn or teach, but rather to be
disruptive and to undermine sincere efforts to contribute.
rather than to observe as i indicated was my goal intitially, i got
brought into the muck. i've learned a lesson but pity other well meaning
individuals caught in similar circunstances.
had i been more computer literate, i guess i wouldn't have made this
mistake. as i tried to explain, i just started using e-mail 2-3 weeks
ago and i know nothing about address book operations.
once again thank you for the opportunity and i wish you well in trading.
tom demark
Jim Osborn wrote:
>
> Tom, thanks for giving the list that explanation behind your thinking.
> As others have mentioned, many of the list members are extremely
> sensitive to black-box system vendors, with good cause, and they
> have a tendency to jump on anything without adequate background
> to illuminate the reasoning behind the methodology. Being a well-
> known author, some of those folks are all too eager to be suspicious.
> But as long as the methodology is explained, there's no grounds
> for complaint, as far as I'm concerned.
> --
> jimo@xxxxxxxxxx
> maintainer of the omega list
> omega-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx
|