|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
On Mon, 26 Oct 1998 UMCANE01@xxxxxxx wrote:
> may not be backwords compatible. When Microsoft developed Win95 I don't think
> they were probably thinking DOS, do you? No, they were probably thinking
DOS 7.0?
> 32-Bit applications, which, from what I've seen, are usually Y2K Compliant?
How did you manage that handwaving leap of faith?
> No? If you have a problem running a DOS based program in Win95 in my opinion,
> I would blame the application but tell the client/user they should try to
> upgrade to 32-Bit. Wouldn't you agree?
Some things you just have to archive forever. This gem is going into a
time capsule. Perhaps when Y10K rolls around everyone will discover they
need to upgrade their DOS10000 systems to 64 bit :-)
Cheers,
Jim
|