|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
See Jim what happens when you stir the pot. This is why I think anybody
that sells to the public in Futures or Securities should have some kind of
accountability before doing so. In stead of after the fact information from
past CFTC or SEC actions. To be fair theses were only allegations that as
far I know can only lead to strong suspicions but not fact. But allegations
should be considered as they are for Futures and Security brokers. I think
Vendors should start a AAA venders stamp of approval for there own benefit
and that would probably head off any regulation from Uncle Sam. The
Internet makes it possible for anybody to check me out anytime by just
going to either the NFA or NASD web page and typing my name in or any
broker for that matter.
Seems like newbies should have the same ease checking a Venor out instead
of having to dig like Carroll had to.
Robert
Carroll Slemaker wrote:
>Did anyone ever get a reply from Jim Cox from his recent post on here ? I
>haven't gotten anything at all. I did a little research on Mr. Cox on
>DejaNews and found some very alarming articles about him and his ways of
>doing business. He was investigated by the CFTC and never refuned peoples
>money back that returned his items within the trail period if they didn't
>like it. I also read that a few people asked for his trading statements and
>he never produced them and he lost money trading two peoples account. Why
>won't Mr. Cox produce a trading records from his broker for people he's
>wanting to trade for ?
>
>I got all of the above info from DejaNews, www.dejanews.com and do a search
>for Bullseye in the misc.invest news groups. A few people also said that he
>posts trades after the fact and never post signals before hand. I contacted
>a few people from DejaNews and they say that he hangs on a chat channel on
>IRC. You need to join Undernet server, then join "futures".
>
>
>
>
|