|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
But we should all agree, that there are lots of ways to make money from the
markets,
just get one thats fits your trading personality internally and externally.
Will take some hard work,but it is worth it, too many people give up along
the way. Just like going after
the Gold in Olympics, many are called, the very few are chosen. Your
reasearch efforts
in finding your private "Holy Grail" might be more based on your personality
than the
market itself.
But most people don't want to work for it, look at those people lining up
buying Lotto
tickets. We only deserve to get what is the results of our efforts. No more,
no less.
DStan34930@xxxxxxx wrote:
> You might be able to employ rocket science (non-gambling indicators)
> in position trading with great success as some have and as I would too if
> I had the mindset and the time to persue the knowledge of the techniques
> required (currently calculus and physics impaired) but too many pieces of
> the intra-day data puzzle are lost between sessions(my opinion only)
> to apply scientific techniques to trades that wont be held overnite.
> The mixed bag approach(my opinion only) applies to daytrading.
> I use my gambling indicators Pierre-style but have not employed any
> software specific to that task.
> Admittedly, I have many scars from gambling indicators and I'm sure
> I haven't caught my last wound but I agree with both Pierre and TJ in
> their approach to managing them.
> Gambling indicators. They're ugly. They're dangerous. Learn to
> harness their benefits or don't use them.
>
> dbs
|