[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Systems Criteria



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

There's an article in the July 98 issue of TASC on developing systems where
the author considers how valid a system is to be just as important as how
successful a system is. He checks things such as standard deviation, largest
gain, max drawdown, etc. to see if a few wildly successful trades distort the
overall percentage gains.

In a message dated 98-09-16 11:03:40 EDT, magnus@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:

> Can some of the more experience systems developer answer a few questions?
>  
>  Of all the criteria on the systems report in TS, what would you consider as
>  an important  criteria in developing a trading system? And what would you
>  consider as acceptable numbers for the following:
>  
>  1) Percentage of winning trades?
>  2) Ratio of Avg. Win/Loss?
>  3) Profit Factor?
>  4) Ratio Largest Win/Largest Loss?
>  
>  I know that some people consider a smooth equity curve as a good criteria
>  but it's hard to see it in TS. I've been told that a Sharpe ratio is also a
>  good criteria but that's not in the indicator library. And I couldn't get
>  the one Mark Brown posted the other day to work. I've also looked at the K
>  Ratio from Lars Kestner but that's not widely followed and there's few
>  reports/articles on it. There's the return retracement in the Portfolio
>  Maximizer but I can't get that to work on intraday trading systems.
>  
>  Any answers would be helpful.
>