|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Robert, of all the views put forward on this subject I find yours the most
acceptable. I suggest that the whole scenario is akin to a soap opera which
is probably why the American public have not altered their view of the
President. In my mind the Starr report has shown the role played by Ms
Lewinsky. It takes two to tango.<g>
The American public knew all about Clinton's morals long before they elected
him as President. Few people can be surprised at the chain of events. Who
knows, as a sex education lesson it might even do some good. It all depends
on how it all ends.
The important thing is to consider how this will affect the Financial
Markets. I think it is likely to present a buying opportunity.
Richard
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert W Cummings <robertwc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Gaius Marius <magnus@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: felixty@xxxxxxxxxxx <felixty@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Robert W Cummings
<robertwc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Trade Jack <trade_jack@xxxxxxxxx>; Omega
<omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 13 September 1998 08:17
Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC Re: Searching the Starr report
>Lying to a grand jury about sex doesn't qualify as an impeachable offense.
>It is perjury but is it impeachable? Is not a legal forum we have but a
>political one especially in the absent of crimes of a criminal intent. Its
>still about sex and sin.
>
>Robert
>
>
>At 02:56 AM 9/13/98 -0400, Gaius Marius wrote:
>>>Even the perjury charges are not valid because
>>>Clinton is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law and I repeat
that
>>>is yet to be even though its obvious.
>>
>>
>>You've got to be kidding !!
>>
>>He went to a grand jury (as well as a legal deposition) and said he didn't
>>have sex with Monica Lewinsky. How did his semen get on her dress? It
>>spontaneously blew out of his penis, went through several layers of his
>>pants and then landed randomly on her dress??
>>
>>Come on. That's lying to a grand jury. That's perjury. And what's with all
>>this legal machinations on the definition of sex?
>>
>>And now he's saying that oral sex is not sex? Heck, if oral sex is not
sex,
>>then why is the word sex in the phrase "oral sex"? And if a 50ish year old
>>guy who went through the sixties and had a daughter with his wife does not
>>know what is sex and what is not, what in the world is he doing as
President
>>of this country? And don't tell me his daughter was conceived by
immaculate
>>conception because he is not God.
>>
>>As for going to court, well, that's what impeachment is for. That's the
only
>>way a sitting President can be put on trial.
>>
>>And I say trial the bastard. He took an oath to uphold and defend the
>>Constitution. He's the chief law enforcement officier. And he lied to a
>>federal grand jury, as well as in a deposition. A deposition is considered
>>to be the same as being on the witness stand, where you raise your right
>>hand and swear to tell the truth, the hold truth and nothing but the
truth,
>>so help you God.
>>
>>Apparently, to Bill Clinton, the truth is relative...depends on his
>>interpretations .....
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
|