[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Server Specification



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Allan Kaminsky <allank@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>At 09:56 AM 9/12/98 -0700, Jim Osborn wrote:
><snip>
>>
>>To that end, and to provoke a diversion from the Starr report, I'd
>>invite a discussion of what we'd like to see in a real-time data
>>server.  Let's put together a software-engineering level product
>>specification.  I'll toss out some ideas of my own later.  In the
>>meantime, let's take Joe up on his challenge.  What do YOU think
>>should be in a real-time data server product spec?
>>
>>Jim
>
>For me, the specs of the UMDS are right on. Plus it's fast.
>
>And, most importantly, it's an open design. Multiple applications can use
>it simultaneously. This is comparable to having an open computer bus where
>you can use anyone's plug-in cards vs a closed proprietary one.

Allan, can you point me to a copy of the spec for the UMDS?
It does sound like one of the better starting points.
I've heard something to the effect that current versions of
UMDS have certain weaknesses in handling historical data,
but that Kent is working to fix those weaknesses.  I'd be
able to comment more intelligently about that if I could read
a real spec.

I understand UMDS has three fatal weaknesses as far as I'm concerned:

1: It doesn't allow the importation of custom data into its
   realtime database.  Same weakness as Omega's server.  I've
   found a workaround for this problem in TS 3.5, but that
   workaround isn't practical for TS 4.0.  Who knows about TS 5.0?

2: It doesn't work on any computer that's connected in any way
   to any network.  This means I couldn't use it on my computer
   that's networked with my wife's computer, even though our
   activities are totally unrelated, except we share resources
   like printers, backup devices, etc.

3: It doesn't run on Linux.  How can any software be considered
   "open" if it requires the use of a Microsoft product?
   Aside from the proprietary nature of the MS environment, I
   consider my trading workstation to be "mission critical" and
   no MS operating system meets that criterion.

Jim