[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: TL_FW: Signal ROS Version 75.00


  • To: sptradr@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: TL_FW: Signal ROS Version 75.00
  • From: Timothy Morge <tmorge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 10 Jul 1998 18:37:17 -0700
  • In-reply-to: <199807102040.PAA30152@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Tony:

Ok, what DOES UMDS give me? I stand by what I said: I ain't buying nothing or
looking at nothing from Omega until my current version of TS is patched and
happy. Me? I can chart by hand if I have to...

But say the turn of the year, this coming January is here, and I don't have a
year 2000 fix on my TS version...What can I do? Do you mean try TradeLab? I have
no intention of becoming a programmer to support my trendline drawings. Is
Tradelab going to be 'idiot-proof' enough for me?

Or have you got another idea?

I'm all ears. As I said...I am not an Omega hater. But they won't see another
dime of mine until TS 4.0 is fixed and patched and has all the feed upgrades it
needs to meet the current feed changes going on with the exchanges. I'll draw on
used paper bags first.

Tim Morge



sptradr@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> tim wrote:
> >>> But this policy of spending all of their resources on a TS 5.0 Beta
> BEFORE they will even finish a year 2000 patch for my existing product just
> gets me angry.
> >And it makes me feel like they have me held hostage [which scares the crap
> out
> >of me]. I just want the product I have fixed and year 2000 compliant. Then
> they
> >can research and do anything they want.
> >
> >Personally, I couldn't even begin to consider purchasing anything, at any
> price
> >UNTIL I have a year 2000 patch in place, working in my existing version of
> >TradeStation. <<<
> 
> Good luck!  Sorry, Tim, but you pushed my hot button. Mark Brown, myself,
> and others presented this case over 10 months ago...still no patch in
> sight! The point is that Omega doesn't give a crap about its established
> users as evidenced by the lack of Y2K compliance with its current software.
> Pretty poor customer relations for a major trading software company.
> 
> Fortunately, UMDS gives us other choices in the immediate future.  And I
> also echo your sentiments about upgrading to TS 5 (no matter how
> "evolutionary" it may be) while TS 4 is still Y2K bug ridden.  Omega SHOULD
> fix its Y2K BUGS first in the core products before imbarking on other
> non-related TS/SC software ventures.
> 
> -Tony Haas