|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Does anyone know if the "file selectors" issue is a factor in limiting NT
resources, as it is in Win-95/98?
If so, that could be the root of the problem, and adding a gazillion
megabytes of Ram won't make any difference...
___________________________________
At 04:56 PM 7/8/98 -0300, you wrote:
>Earl Adamy wrote:
>
>> In the FWIW department, the 128 meg seems to be overkill but I wasn't
sure where
>> the payoff would stop and it was too cheap to pass.
>
>This depends on what you're running.
>
>> Based upon what I'm seeing, I would opine that 64 meg
>> is probably about ideal and that 96 meg would provide more than adequate
>> cushion.
>
>Try running a few hundred, let alone thousands, of open charts in TS or SC real
>time. This will be a humbling experience. I figure the ideal for me would be
>around 12 gigs (and maybe even this wouldn't be enough).
>
>A.J.
>
>
>
|