|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
> Here are the results on the S&P tick-count survey.
>
> First, I would expect that everyone using the same data vendor and
> delivery mode would get the same number of ticks. The fact that
> your data show a wide deviation indicates that some of you may be
> missing data possibly because of a combination of: huge portfolios,
> slow I/O ports, very CPU-intensive indicators/systems, and slow
> CPUs. Following are the counts for May 6:
>
> CME . . . . . 4911
> Highest . . . 4895 Pierre Orphelin, Comstock satellite, France
> Lowest .. . . 4621 BMI satellite, Chicago
>
> BMI satellite was by far the most prevalent vendor & mode reported,
> with 7 reports for May 6. The highest BMI-sat count was 4892 (4
> reports) and one report each of 4835, 4785, and 4621.
>
> There were only two BMI cable reports: 4890, & 4731
>
> One Signal cable report (mine): 4836
>
> "DBC" satellite, Hans Esser: 4765
>
> Summary - May 6:
>
> CME . . . . 4911
> Comstock sat 4895
> BMI sat . . 4892 (4 repts), 4835, 4785, 4621
> BMI cable. . 4890, 4731
> Sig cable. . 4836
> "DBC" sat. . 4765
>
>
> Summary - May 7:
>
> CME . . . . 4441
> BMI sat . . 4433, 4428, 4368, 4366, 4341
> BMI cable. . 4432, 4427, 4272
> Sig cable. . 4375
"DBC" satellite, Hans Esser: 4308
rgds hans
PS: Carroll, see what I mean - DBC usually 1-2% at most lower than
BMI - (yes I would take BMI aswell, there not available in europe)
> The complete lowdown on the two CME files will be forthcoming as
> soon as I get a report back from my contact at the CME.
>
> Carroll Slemaker
>
> PS - Is there anyone else out there on Signal cable???
>
~~~~~
....and bear in mind
that high reward does not come without its partner high risk !
|