|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Robert and crew,
This is software, not a system or methodology. It is intended, if I have it
correctly myself, to assist traders as a tool. It will do nothing without the
trader's implimentation and application of his own ideas regarding the markets.
Specifically, in answer to the question "Why?". I can think of two good reasons:
1) To earn money by using existing programming skills that few posess.
2) To assist others by giving them a better tool to do their work with.
(A less common and often questioned motive for doing anything these days)
There also is a third reason that I can think of. It follows suit with the
existence of this and other traders email lists, seminars, forums, brokerages
(with trading rooms), etc. that is: 3)to gather and associate with people who
share a common interest or goal. To communicate, exchange and thus learn while
exercising the natural trait of "being social". Trading and research have many
commonalities, one of which is; it is usually done alone.
I don't think that this good software called Tradelab (which I have) will
identify any profitable patterns within the markets. But, over time of the
learning curve, it sure will allow me to do so.
See U
Tom
planeacres@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
What can you take with you when you're dead? That is the Question.
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert W Cummings <robertwc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Trading Programs
>>I have no interest in Scientific Approaches except being a happy trader and
>>new TradeLab user. In addition to technical superiority they know what
>>outstanding customer service means. Product information is at
>>http://sciapp.com
>>JimGavey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>For all the new people on this list a comment to this and all trading
>systems referred to on this list nothing personal.
>I always have the same question if Tradelab is so good then why sell just
>use it yourself ? Why would Scientific Approaches and Bob Brickey want to
>sell something that makes money because they need the money, isn't that
>what your claiming is it makes.
>
>Robert
>
>
|