[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Hashnums and Global Pro?


  • To: Jim Lovejoy <fastgroup@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: Hashnums and Global Pro?
  • From: "Allan L. Kaminsky" <allank@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 29 Dec 1997 19:39:15 -0800 (PST)
  • In-reply-to: <01bd1402$0965d280$3b50eecd@xxx/fastgroup>

PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Jim:

I use HashNums and have quickly found it to be irreplaceable.

1. Any user of the DLL sees the same physical address; a change is seen
by all users.

2. You physically break your code into subsystems. The technique is well
illustrated in the HashNums documentation. A general technique would be
to write multiple subsystems, as necessary. The final system would do
the trades. Any indicators could also be provided for, with the actual
Plot statements occurring in the indicators which would also be
referencing HashNums.

Allan
___________________________________________

Jim Lovejoy wrote:
> 
> A few questions....
> 
> 1.)  Is it correct to say that since the global variables in both DLLs are
> memory addresses that as soon as one system changes a global variable all
> the other systems see the change?
> 
> 2.    a.)  Concerning the 64kb work around,  When you are writing code and
> reach the 64kb limit does it link to a new file or do you just keep coding
> in the same file?
> 
>         b.) If you link two files instead of just making one file bigger
> then 64kb, How do the files link?  Is it like a branch
>              statement or something similar.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Jim Lovejoy
> fastgroup@xxxxxxxxxx
> "To see what is in front one's nose is a constant struggle"
>                                                          -George Orwell