|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Seems to me, by doing it Steve's way, he accomplishes two things:
1. Avoids curve fitting by reducing the dependance on look back
periods.
2. Building a system that is more flexible and allows for
variations, while trying to capture most of the moves. I was
impressed the way he looked at the trigger levels, and found
workable levels around 41, 42, 47, 48, etc, and decided to pick 45.
I hadn't thought of looking at it that way before. By getting rid of
some of the precision, it may actually be more robust and get you in
and out of a trade more efficiently.
A very well put together seminar, that I learned a lot from. I've
watched it twice just to make sure I caught everything.
Big
-- In equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pumrysh <no_reply@xxx> wrote:
>
> All,
>
> Steve's Webinar was certainly enjoyable. Just wanted to see what
> others thought about the way he optimized. Basically he was
optimizing
> triggers. Recently one of our member's questioned optimizing
lookback
> periods.
>
> My own view on optimization is that optimizing triggers is a
better
> way of using this feature.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Preston
>
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/equismetastock/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/equismetastock/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:equismetastock-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:equismetastock-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
equismetastock-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|