|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
These guys test a large number of "black box" systems. Most cost
between $1500 and $10,000. But who cares what they cost, they're going
to make you a fortune. That's why all the major traders use them.
http://www.futurestruth.com/
--- In Metastockusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Richard Hu, ePurchasing
Association" <rhu@xxxx> wrote:
> Does anyone know if there is a proven profitable trading system (not
> just an indicator that may or may not work) for sale / lease?
> If so, how much do they charge for it?
>
> Richard
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Metastockusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:Metastockusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of P Umrysh
> Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 10:07 AM
> To: Metastockusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [Metastockusers] Re: New Adaptive Tools for Metastock
>
> Andrew,
>
> I agree...price is too high!
>
> Brad also assumes that adaptive DLL's have not already been written.
> They have. I have a set and quite frankly don't find them very useful.
>
> Preston
>
>
>
> --- In Metastockusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Andrew Tomlinson"
> <andrew_tomlinson@xxxx> wrote:
> >
> > So let's assume that these are well coded indicators. I like them
> so much
> > that I start to use them . Maybe I build them into a system I want
> to use.
> > Then what - I'm locked in to paying these guys a large some of
> money every
> > year for ever? Or someone wants to use them as a small part of a
> system they
> > want to sell someone else - are they going to have to pay royalties?
> >
> > These aren't systems, they're indicators. They are building bricks
> that, if
> > they're useful, you may use as part of something larger. What would
> it be
> > like is Wilder or Appel or Bollinger or Lane (or their estates)
> decided that
> > they wanted to patent their indicators so you would have to pay a
> licensing
> > fee for as long as you used them?
> >
> > Look, I can only speak for myself. I was excited when I saw the
> post. It
> > looked like a really useful contribution. But I was staggered when
> I saw the
> > pricing scheme. To my mind it looks like a bad precedent for
> Metastock
> > coders and a bad precedent for Technical Analysis. But I'm curious
> now -
> > what does everyone else think? Is this a good way to go? Should we
> pay
> > on-going licensing fees for every piece of code that people
> contribute to
> > this site?
> >
> > Yes, people deserve to get paid for good code. But this pricing
> model sure
> > doesn't work for me.
> >
> > What do you all think?
> >
> > Andrew
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> _____
>
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> * Visit your group "Metastockusers
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Metastockusers> " on the web.
>
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Metastockusers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:Metastockusers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.
>
> _____
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Metastockusers/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Metastockusers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|