|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
"Many people do not totally understand diversion and perhaps they do
not investigate the errors in your code to the extent that I do."
Perhaps when Mr Brewster learns to spell *divergence*, he may then
begin to understand the subject he claims to know so much about.
"The MACD Histogram Formula (the one Jose refuses to give to his
clients):
( Mov( C,12,E ) - Mov( C,26,E ) ) - Mov( ( Mov( C,12,E ) - Mov(
C,26,E ) ),9,E ) "
Laughable argument. The MACD Histogram code is as much of a secret
as the MACD formula itself: zilch. I don't refuse to give it to
anyone, because this most basic formula is openly available from the
same source Mr Brewster copied it from: MetaStock' help file.
End of correspondence on this matter from me.
jose '-)
--- In Metastockusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Jay" <JayTownsend@xxxx> wrote:
> Jose, seeing as you have taken to not only stretching the truth
about me but
> outright lying, I will set the record straight.
>
>
>
> Jose writes:
>
>
>
> <<By his own admission, Mr Brewster was an employee of Boeing in the
60's,
> being in charge of some software projects there with a team of
software
> programmers under his control. Time and time again, as he pointed
out on
> several lengthy emails to me, he claims that he had a major battle
> controlling these "brilliant but unruly" programmers, a war which he
says he
> eventually won.>>
>
>
>
> I spent 25 years in the Boeing computing department (BCS) beginning
in the
> 1960's - programming and eventually supervising programmers leaving
in
> 1989 - not 1960. I never battled with programmers (nor did I
indicate to
> Jose that I did) but I did find that many, though not all, became so
> enamored with their code that they neither documented nor allowed
others to
> understand it until Boeing and all major computer companies came up
with
> design, testing, and documentation standards. Many, but many
brilliant
> programmers simply could not live under these conditions - imposed
by
> Boeing - not by me, and left.
>
>
>
> <<However, in a constant barrage of mails from him, it was obvious
to me
> that his disdain for programmers was more than evident.>>
>
>
>
> I have never expressed a disdain for programmers, only pointed out
to you
> that several could not live in a world that required step by step
design,
> coding, and testing standards, as required by all major corporations
today.
>
>
>
> Jose, by your own admission the documentation of your "MACDH Kit" is
> seriously lacking. In fact, you wrote to me that if you properly
documented
> it you would have to sell it for a far higher price and you would
not be
> able to keep up with demand.
>
>
>
> <<Now, 40 years later, Mr Brewster still carries the scars from
those past
> battles, and seems to have an irrational hatred for anyone he
> perceives as being of the same genre as his former "adversaries".>>
>
>
>
> It's only 16 years Jose. Scars??? Just a recognition that
brilliance does
> not necessarily equal the ability to seek out errors within one's
own work.
> And I have never questioned either you brilliance, or your support
of the
> MetaStock community.
>
>
>
> <<intermixed with racist ravings about the Chinese taking over the
world.>>
>
>
>
> A total lie. I used a quotation from a source I identified as
raciest AFTER
> Jose complained that the Chinese were attempting to take over
Australia. I
> have met Chinese in Korea, visited them in various parts of China,
and have
> nothing but admiration for them and their entrepreneurial abilities.
If it
> frightens you Jose, that's not my problem.
>
>
>
> <<With time it became clear to me than that Mr Brewster had a
specific
> agenda, and that it had little or nothing to do with my software or
> services, but more with his gripe over his imaginary enemies.
>
> Finally, when Mr Brewster resorted to spamming my public email box
with 20Mb
> attachments of irrelevant material, it was time to put my
> foot down. I asked him politely to stop, but he replied that he
would go
> ahead and smear my good name all over the Net. I had no choice but
to block
> his email address.>>
>
>
>
> Again, lots of lies Jose. The "SPAM" Jose is referring to is my
> documentation of errors that exist in the MACDH Kit. They are still
there
> Jose, and I can still document them if you would but look at them.
>
>
>
> << As for his current claims that I fail to support my clients, that
my
> software is full of errors, and any other malicious accusations, my
> record speaks for myself.>>
>
>
>
> It certainly does Jose. The errors continue to spew from your plug-
in.
> These are not malicious accusations, but facts.
>
> << My reputation for being thorough and accurate with MetaStock code
rivals
> that of Roy.
>
>
>
> Additionally, I spend close to 20hrs of my time each week providing
free
> support to several forums and usergroups, compiling and providing
free
> useful data and formulae at MetaStockTools.com, and offering free
support
> and advice to all my clients without question.
>
> On reflection, the amazing thing about this saga is that with over
400
> satisfied clients since 1999, I have only ever encountered two
> trouble-makers. This speaks very highly of our trading community,
and I
> wouldn't be happier spending all my time and energy anywhere else.>>
>
>
>
> I have NEVER questioned your abilities with MetaStock nor your free
support.
> You are indeed THE MetaStock savant with a much better understanding
MS than
> the Equis technicians. However, that does not correct the problems
in your
> "kit." Your ability to divert attention from problems with your Kit
is as
> rampant here as in your emails to me.
>
>
>
> Many people do not totally understand diversion and perhaps they do
not
> investigate the errors in your code to the extent that I do. If
that makes
> me a troublemaker then that's what I am. If you view users with
legitimate
> questions about errors in your system, then I am more than happy to
be, as
> you put it, a troublemaker.
>
>
>
> By the way, Walter Bressert's plug-in gives much better signals than
the
> MACDH Kit and is half the price (which drove Jose off the deep end
when I
> mentioned it to him).
>
>
>
> When it comes to Jose's MACDH Kit, my suggestion is for the buyer to
beware.
> It has errors and once you question those errors you get the
vindictive that
> I have quoted above. You can save a lot of bucks by entering the
MACD
> Historgram formula into MetaStock and eyeballing diversion for
yourself.
>
>
>
> Jim
>
>
>
> The MACD Histogram Formula (the one Jose refuses to give to his
clients):
>
>
>
> ( Mov( C,12,E ) - Mov( C,26,E ) ) - Mov( ( Mov( C,12,E ) - Mov(
> C,26,E ) ),9,E )
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
What would our lives be like without music, dance, and theater?
Donate or volunteer in the arts today at Network for Good!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Tcy2bD/SOnJAA/cosFAA/zMEolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Metastockusers/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Metastockusers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|