|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
IMHO, the results from all are useless from a statistical point of view.
You don't have enough trades in any of them for the results to be
statistically valid. You need a minimum of 30 and ideally greater than 100
before the results are statistically valid.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bodaire" <bodaire88@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "EquisMetaStock" <equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "MetastockUsers"
<Metastockusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 12:22 AM
Subject: [Metastockusers] Which is Better?
> I've been thinking about this question and I can't
> decide which is better. The figures are for 1.00
> Lots per trade with no MM. I don't know which
> would give better results with MM. Here are some
> sample figures for A, B and C:
>
> %Profit A) 48 B) 65 C) 80
> #Trades A) 12 B) 18 C) 25
> #W/#L A) 1.87 B) 1.98 C) 2.79
> %Prof/Trade A) 4.00 B) 3.51 C) 3.21
> %Prof/Day A) 1.49 B) 2.01 C) 2.50
>
> What's more important in the long run? Making more
> money per trading day (1 week=5days)? Making more
> money per trade with less trades? The better W/L
> ratio? Something else?
>
> Bodaire
> -----------
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Yahoo! Domains - Claim yours for only $14.70
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Z1wmxD/DREIAA/yQLSAA/zMEolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Metastockusers/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Metastockusers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|