|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Kevin,
Let me add a question about AmiBroker.
What I want to do is very simple: have a formula call another formula the
way we do in MS:
myVar:= fml("myFormula");
Can this be done with AFL? If yes, then how? Could you provide the AB
equivalent?
Whenever I ask this question I get no answer! I have asked a couple of AB
users privately, I have asked
publicly, I have asked Tomasz Janeczko. No positive replies no negative
ones! Nothing! Very strange, isn't it?
So I hope you will be kind enough to post a reply.
Thank you in advance.
Spyros
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 7
Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 05:30:29 -0000
From: "bex1210" <hmw3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: v8 System Tester Issues and how to fix.
Tom:
You said:
>>In the mean time, I have converted all my trading systems and explorations
to Amibroker for $200 - real time analysis and a few hours effort. Hardly
the cost of a "bad fill".
So I now have an alternative to Metastock.
Like I said, I used Metastock to make a lot of money in the past, but 8.0
and 8.01 don't cut it. Several of my unanswered complaints to Equis are
readily available in Amibroker.<<
I looked at Amibroker 4.2 briefly while I was evaluating Metastock 8 (EOD
version). I'll admit I was turned off because, until you paid for the
program, you had to create your database each time you opened the program,
couldn't save any formulas, etc: in short, you had to essentially start over
ever time you opened the program. It takes me a while to understand a
program, and I wasn't able to do it effectively with the Amibroker sample.
Metastock gave me 30 days and a fully functional program to evaluate.
Having said that, a few questions now that you have switched:
1. Will Amibroker accept your Metastock formulas for system testing and
indicators, or do you have to learn a new language?
2. You said it overcomes some of the Metastock 8 shortcomings. What are
these?
3. And since no program is perfect, what shortcomings does Amibroker have
that Metastock did NOT have?
Harry
--- In equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kevin243@xxxx wrote:
> Joe J,
>
> I've used Metastock for years and have made money with it. But Version
8.0
> has driven me to check out Amibroker. I'm also one of the posted success
> stories on Equis' Website. My expectations were pretty lofty for 8.0 and
> 8.01. So far, I've be disappointed. I rather go back to 7.2. I'm using
> the Professional Version in all cases. It was a disappointment in Equis
even
> shipping it to me. (almost a month)
>
> 8.0/.01 is way too slow, too memory intensive, and is too restricted on
time
> frame. I asked their tech support several times for help and pointed out
> that their answers weren't anywhere in the documentation. Their tech
support
> didn't disagree with that either. So as far as future purchases of Equis
> products, they will have to be significantly better than 8.0 or 8.01.
>
> In the mean time, I have converted all my trading systems and explorations
to
> Amibroker for $200 - real time analysis and a few hours effort. Hardly
the
> cost of a "bad fill".
>
> So I now have an alternative to Metastock.
>
> Like I said, I used Metastock to make a lot of money in the past, but 8.0
and
> 8.01 don't cut it. Several of my unanswered complaints to Equis are
readily
> available in Amibroker.
>
> Future software purchases will be made based on value to me, not on past
> reputation.
>
> Kevin Campbell
>
>
> In a message dated 5/12/03 4:28:02 PM Central Daylight Time, jojab@xxxx
> writes:
>
> >
> > Tom,
> >
> > I am aware how the system tester places trades. I've been using MS off
and
> > one since the '80's and have been using 8.0 since it was released.
> > Although I am focused on the ES and use the points only option in my
system
> > testing, I did run some sample tests using the % equity option before
> > responding this morning. By changing various options, I was able to
> > generate quite a number of different results. I was also able to
duplicate
> > your "taking the trade problem". I agree with you that when using the
> > system tester, you need to look on the orders screen to make sure all
the
> > orders considered were executed.
> >
> > I have also used the "ref()" function in the past to fix problems with
> > entries.
> >
> > I'm not clear from your emails if you have been able to get the system
> > tester working the way you want to or not (did the ref() work for you)?
If
> > not, why not post your intended entries/exits and let's see if I, or
> > someone else in the group, can find a solution? I often find that MS
will
> > allow you to do just about anything if you work at it.
> >
> > Good Trading,
> >
> > Joe J.
> >
> >
> >
________________________________________________________________________
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Rent DVDs Online - Over 14,500 titles.
No Late Fees & Free Shipping.
Try Netflix for FREE!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/YoVfrB/XP.FAA/uetFAA/BefplB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
equismetastock-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|