[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WinXP Workarounds (was which Windows?)



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Thanks for this Mark. Can't comment Equis's quality, but you should remember
that the APIs differ between releases of windows i.e. calls which were
available will be no longer available. From the earliest days Microsoft have
never been a company to ensure backwards compatibility. The older ones
amongst us may recall this was the basis of their falling out with IBM.

However, what does intrigue me is your statement about compatibility mode.
Should I presume that your application runs in what is in effect a secure
environment which is running 98 under XP? If so that sounds a real
performance boost! (Joke).
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark B" <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 1:23 AM
Subject: WinXP Workarounds (was which Windows?)


> Ok, silly of me to say I have a metastock XP fix and then not post it....
so
> I will now remedy that  :)
>
> I had two problems with Metastock on XP (I have had both problems on two
> different machines, so I assume it's fairly common). I came up with these
> fixes myself, so am curious to know if others have the same problems I had
> and these fixes work.
>
> First, I had problems installing it. I don't remember the error, but it
just
> wouldn't work.
>
> Solution: copy CD contents to hard disk, run the setup.exe in Windows 98
> compatibility mode (right click > properties > compatibility). I recollect
> there being some warning messages during the install but it all works fine
> for me, 0 problems.
>
> Second, regular crashing once installed.
>
> Solution: select "mswin.exe" (the main metastock program file), right
click
> > properties > compatibility mode > "Disable visual themes". That turns
off
> the fancy round corners, etc., so when you run it it looks more like an
"old
> style" (ie Win2K) windows program, no big deal.
>
> I have had no metastock problems at all since applying these workarounds.
> Does make me wonder (and I've had an offline discussion with a group
member
> who shares my concerns) about the quality of Equis' engineering.
Generally,
> if you follow the "rules" of writing windows software, upgrades won't
affect
> you. Suspicious.
>
> This is one of the great features of XP, "Compatibility mode". I've had a
> few packages that didn't run straight away on XP, but compatibility mode
has
> fixed all of them. Cool!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mark
>
>