|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
"Period value out of valid range"
Has anyone got a fix for this error? None of the explorers will run, and
all have this or a similar error.
Tech support has been useless so far.
Thanks,
Jim
----- Original Message -----
From: "metastock-digest" <owner-metastock-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 6:30 AM
Subject: metastock-digest V1 #1344
>
> metastock-digest Monday, May 21 2001 Volume 01 : Number
1344
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 13:35:22 -0500
> From: "Lionel Issen" <lissen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: QP2 Directory limitation -- Janene
>
> I don't think so. There was a law passed in the early 1950s that was
> supposed to stop this. A seller cannot discriminate between purchasers of
> the same class (single purchaser, retail purchaser, wholesale purchaser).
> Lionel Issen
> lissen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> - ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John R" <jrdrp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 10:52 AM
> Subject: Re: QP2 Directory limitation -- Janene
>
>
> > Is it legal in US for Equis to discriminate in this way about to whom
they
> > will sell the SDK?
> >
> > John
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Lionel Issen" <lissen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 3:01 PM
> > Subject: Re: QP2 Directory limitation -- Janene
> >
> >
> > Can Equis patent or copywrite their data format?
> > Lionel Issen
> > lissen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: mj.cava
> > To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 5:52 AM
> > Subject: Re: QP2 Directory limitation -- Janene
> >
> >
> >
> > FI
> >
> > A 5 january 1999 comment from Steve Kalhas, i-Soft (Stockwiz)
> >
> > " A lot of the StockWiz users want to export data to the Metastock
> format
> > but Equis refuses to license their library to us because they said, we
are
> > competing with them on the data-sales front. Given that our data prices
> are
> > $9.95 per month and theirs are $30-$70, etc., I think they got a point.
"
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Allan Havemose" <havemose@xxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 10:22 PM
> > Subject: Re: QP2 Directory limitation -- Janene
> >
> >
> > > For an individual it inexpensive. I have the read/write kit and paid
> > > something like $250 (maybe less - it's a while ago).
> > >
> > > Allan
> > >
> > > --- Lionel Issen <lissen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > Maybe Equis is charging too much for this kit. Does anyone know?
> > > > Lionel Issen
> > > > lissen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Allan Havemose" <havemose@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 10:10 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: QP2 Directory limitation -- Janene
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > The metastock developers kit supports 2000 file directories, so
> > > > QP2's
> > > > > explanation is not valid. Maybe Equis does not want to license
the
> > > > MSFL
> > > > > kit to QP2, since they are a data competitor ?
> > > > >
> > > > > Allan
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > =====
> > > ---
> > > Allan Havemose, Ph.D.
> > > havemose@xxxxxxxxxx
> > > havemose@xxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
> > > http://auctions.yahoo.com/
> >
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 12:25:53 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Robert Lambert <lambertb1@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: System Tester Equity Line
>
> To List & MS Support:
>
> Is there any way to gain access to the Equity Line
> in System Tester, as either an indicator or data
> field?
>
> Let's say I wished to apply a moving average to the
> Equity Line, and decided I wanted my system
> to automatically exit,if the Equity Line
> crossed its moving average.Is it possible to
> specify such a condition within the System tester
> Entry/Exit conditions?
>
>
> By the way, I'm referring to MS 7 EOD.
>
> Bob
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
> http://auctions.yahoo.com/
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 14:16:51 -0500
> From: John Moore <chartist1951@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Lionel Issen - You've Become A Dreadful Bore
>
> My God man, what is driving you? It's apparent that you want to pay
> excursion fees and go first class. If you want a good product, why not buy
> 7.2 and their data feed? Why insist on hybrids and trying to hold EQUIS's
> feet to the fire for their inadequacies? Your bashing of QuotesPlus is a
> disgrace! I just read a post where you want StockWhiz to work, are you
> kidding?
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 15:42:17 EDT
> From: Jonkel@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Confused
>
> - --part1_c1.e833dac.2836d519_boundary
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> In a message dated 18/05/01 19:32:43 GMT Daylight Time,
kernish@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> writes:
>
>
> > http://www.cedarcreektrading.com
> >
>
> I agree with you wholeheartedly...............I have just upgraded to 7.2
> from 6.52 and have used Metastock successfully for over 4 years now. Too
> many people purchase a programme and expect it to think for
> them...........well in my opinion it is a tool - and MS is a most valuable
> one - so whether you dig your garden to produce fertile soil or whether
you
> let it lie fallow is for you to decide. I keep churning the indicators
to
> find the most useful ones for my trading style.
>
>
>
> - --part1_c1.e833dac.2836d519_boundary
> Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> <HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT COLOR="#0000ff" SIZE=2>In a
message dated 18/05/01 19:32:43 GMT Daylight Time, kernish@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> <BR>writes:
> <BR>
> <BR></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" SIZE=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial"
LANG="0">
> <BR><BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid;
MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT:
5px">http://www.cedarcreektrading.com
> <BR></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" SIZE=3 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial"
LANG="0"></BLOCKQUOTE>
> <BR></FONT><FONT COLOR="#0000ff" SIZE=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial"
LANG="0">
> <BR>I agree with you wholeheartedly...............I have just upgraded to
7.2
> <BR>from 6.52 and have used Metastock successfully for over 4 years now.
Too
> <BR>many people purchase a programme and expect it to think for
> <BR>them...........well in my opinion it is a tool - and MS is a most
valuable
> <BR>one - so whether you dig your garden to produce fertile soil or
whether you
> <BR>let it lie fallow is for you to decide. I keep churning
the indicators to
> <BR>find the most useful ones for my trading style.
> <BR>
> <BR></FONT></HTML>
>
> - --part1_c1.e833dac.2836d519_boundary--
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 20:42:34 +0100
> From: "David Jennings" <DavidJennings@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Confused
>
> I would point you all to these little Tales of the Budo:
> http://www.gradeyourtrade.com/insight-basics.html
> http://www.gradeyourtrade.com/insight-priorities.html
>
>
> Hajime
>
> DJ
> - ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve Karnish" <kernish@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 6:25 PM
> Subject: Re: Confused
>
>
> > John,
> >
> > Review your emails and please note, after sorting with the "from"
button,
> > that most "problem" post come from a very selective few. I honestly
have
> > trouble imagining how anyone can trade while writing endless emails
about
> > what a horrible product MS is.
> >
> > In fact, considering the endless hours of bashing that some folks
consume
> > writing these negative posts, my opinion is that they should move on to
> > another product. I know I put a loose dollar amount on what my time is
> > worth. It seems a few would rather complain and then, invest hundreds
of
> > hours structuring their complaints in MS posts. Since this is an
> "investing
> > forum", does it make sense to invest time in this black hole.
> >
> > I have no complaints. I use ESig and Pro and day/swing trade the beans,
> > wheat and the emini. EOD is just fine for the majority of my mechanical
> > trading. The real-time trading keeps me awake. Never, ever, not even
> once,
> > have i considered MS as a handicap to appreciating equity. I think
those
> > that complain the loudest, trade the least.
> >
> > I repeat, even though I've had my own issues, over 14 years of use, MS
> (EOD
> > or Pro) is the best bang for the money on the market. Show me something
> > better and I'll buy it.
> >
> > Take care,
> >
> > Steve Karnish, CTA
> > Cedar Creek Trading
> > http://www.cedarcreektrading.com
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "John Moore" <chartist1951@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 9:02 AM
> > Subject: Confused
> >
> >
> > > I've seen a ton of email concerning QuotesPlus and issues with
> MetaStock.
> > >
> > > I'm too new to understand what's going on. About 2 weeks ago, I
> installed
> > > 7.2 and hooked up the Reuter's data feed. I don't have any of these
> > problems
> > > or at least I am not aware of them.
> > >
> > > Is there a MS/Reuters user that knows if I have issues with what I've
> > > purchased?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > John
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 20:42:32 +0100
> From: Roberts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Simon Roberts)
> Subject: Re: Confused
>
> John
>
> You have chosen well. Metastock is good value, and you get a lot of
product
> for your money. The 7.02 eod upgrade I use, gave me a vast increase in
task
> speed, for a nominal charge. There are rather a lot of moaning minnies on
> this list, who enjoy their problems, the way that some old folks enjoy
poor
> health.
>
> Simon
>
> - -----Original Message-----
> From: John Moore
> Date: 18 May 2001 19:05
> Subject: Confused
>
>
> >I've seen a ton of email concerning QuotesPlus and issues with MetaStock.
> >
> >I'm too new to understand what's going on. About 2 weeks ago, I installed
> >7.2 and hooked up the Reuter's data feed. I don't have any of these
> problems
> >or at least I am not aware of them.
> >
> >Is there a MS/Reuters user that knows if I have issues with what I've
> >purchased?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >John
> >
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 16:03:42 -0400
> From: "John Manasco" <john@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Confused
>
> John
>
> Read what Steve Karnish wrote. He's a professional trader not an amateur
> whiner.
>
> John Manasco
> - ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Moore" <chartist1951@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 12:02 PM
> Subject: Confused
>
>
> > I've seen a ton of email concerning QuotesPlus and issues with
MetaStock.
> >
> > I'm too new to understand what's going on. About 2 weeks ago, I
installed
> > 7.2 and hooked up the Reuter's data feed. I don't have any of these
> problems
> > or at least I am not aware of them.
> >
> > Is there a MS/Reuters user that knows if I have issues with what I've
> > purchased?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > John
> >
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 15:08:07 -0500
> From: "Tom Sprunger" <tlsprunger@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Confused
>
> I use Reuter's and love it. I have had absolutely zero problems. The data
> is always correct, as I have yet to find a problem. One button to click
and
> its done. The only mild complaint I have is that the data isn't ready
until
> about 7pm ET and sometimes some of the market data isn't there until
around
> 7:30. Now this is what they told me to expect so its really just a mild
> annoyance.
>
> Some people like to use QP because in addition to the price/vol data, QP
has
> fundamental data.
>
> Tom
> - ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Moore" <chartist1951@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 11:02 AM
> Subject: Confused
>
>
> > I've seen a ton of email concerning QuotesPlus and issues with
MetaStock.
> >
> > I'm too new to understand what's going on. About 2 weeks ago, I
installed
> > 7.2 and hooked up the Reuter's data feed. I don't have any of these
> problems
> > or at least I am not aware of them.
> >
> > Is there a MS/Reuters user that knows if I have issues with what I've
> > purchased?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > John
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 15:59:37 -0500
> From: "Lionel Issen" <lissen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Lionel Issen - You've Become A Dreadful Bore
>
> John:
> Please grow up.
> You have misunderstood what I have said. Both Metastock and QP have
> shortcomings that could be fixed.
> At the same time they are viable and useable programs
> If you want to discuss this further, write me directly.
> Lionel Issen
> lissen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> - ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Moore" <chartist1951@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 2:16 PM
> Subject: Lionel Issen - You've Become A Dreadful Bore
>
>
> > My God man, what is driving you? It's apparent that you want to pay
> > excursion fees and go first class. If you want a good product, why not
buy
> > 7.2 and their data feed? Why insist on hybrids and trying to hold
EQUIS's
> > feet to the fire for their inadequacies? Your bashing of QuotesPlus is a
> > disgrace! I just read a post where you want StockWhiz to work, are you
> > kidding?
> >
> >
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 23:00:14 +0100
> From: "David Jennings" <DavidJennings@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Confused
>
> Absolutely right.
>
> BTW. Steve, I owe you a few beers on the strength of the insight you gave
me
> on candlesticks.
> When your in London I'll gladly repay it.
> DJ
> - ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Manasco" <john@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 9:03 PM
> Subject: Re: Confused
>
>
> > John
> >
> > Read what Steve Karnish wrote. He's a professional trader not an amateur
> > whiner.
> >
> > John Manasco
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "John Moore" <chartist1951@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 12:02 PM
> > Subject: Confused
> >
> >
> > > I've seen a ton of email concerning QuotesPlus and issues with
> MetaStock.
> > >
> > > I'm too new to understand what's going on. About 2 weeks ago, I
> installed
> > > 7.2 and hooked up the Reuter's data feed. I don't have any of these
> > problems
> > > or at least I am not aware of them.
> > >
> > > Is there a MS/Reuters user that knows if I have issues with what I've
> > > purchased?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > John
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 16:54:39 -0700
> From: Daniel Martinez <DanM@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: ON TOPIC: NASDAQ Head & Shoulders Pattern - Revised
>
> My updated chart still shows NASDAQ within my downtrend channel (10).
> Although the HTML version shows the close at the upper channel line, in
> MetaStock EOD 6.52 it's just below it. In any event, NASDAQ needs to
break
> decisively above the upper line and then retest it before you can say
we're in
> a new bull market.
> http://DLM.50megs.com/Nasdaq-Head-and-Shoulders-Revised.htm
>
> Notice the ticker on the chart: "^IXIC." Even though I am subscribed to
QP,
> ironically for the NASDAQ charts I examine, I do not use QP for this and
other
> indexes. I am using Yahoo data which is free. I use Yahoo data for my
> indexes because in many cases they go back further. For NASDAQ, Yahoo's
data
> goes back to Oct, 1984. Because of the severe bear market we had until
> 4/4/01, I had to use Yahoo's data so I could use long-term indicators such
as
> a 200 day ROC. I use QP for stock data. I'll will be looking for other
> chart/price patterns for NASDAQ. If you have any suggestions, LMK.
>
> Daniel.
>
>
>
> > I created a revised chart of the NASDAQ which predicts a drop to 1,346.
> > This is a more realistic figure and I believe more accurate. You can
find
> > the new chart here:
> > http://DLM.50megs.com/Nasdaq-Head-and-Shoulders-Revised.htm
> >
> > If you are familiar with TA price patterns, LMK what you think. Do you
> > think this is an accurate chart? Does anyone here use price patterns or
> > do you only use MetaStock Explorations?
> >
> > This is the text in the chart:
> > ======================================
> > This is a logarithmic chart.
> > 1. Red horizontal line is at 3,238.
> > 2. Blue horizontal line is at 3,064.
> > 3. Red vertical line extends down to 1,325.
> > 4. Blue vertical line extends down to 964.
> > 9. Brown vertical line extends down to 1,346.
> >
> > This is a revision of the chart which I first posted. I remembered
> > another TA
> > specialist used 2 lines at an angle for the base line in the H&S. I
> > thought
> > about this last night and I did the same. Line (2) is the first base
line
> > for the
> > H&S. Line (8) is the second. Notice the retest at point (7). Line (9)
> > is the
> > length from line (8) to point (5), the head, straight up through the
green
> >
> > arrow. The shoulders are at points (6). Line (9) extends down to
1,346.
> > This is a more realistic figure and more plausible. Notice how line (9)
> > is
> > within the down-channel (10) farther into the future.
> > ======================================
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 03:39:28 -0700
> From: "John Sellers" <ay286@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: QP2 Directory limitation -- Janene
>
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
> - ------=_NextPart_000_0016_01C0DF4C.242CD3C0
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> Please state the format used with SockWiz. Metastock can convert some
> formats.
> - -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On
> Behalf Of mj.cava
> Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 3:53 AM
> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: QP2 Directory limitation -- Janene
>
>
>
> FI
>
> A 5 january 1999 comment from Steve Kalhas, i-Soft (Stockwiz)
>
> " A lot of the StockWiz users want to export data to the Metastock format
> but Equis refuses to license their library to us because they said, we are
> competing with them on the data-sales front. Given that our data prices
are
> $9.95 per month and theirs are $30-$70, etc., I think they got a point. "
>
> - ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Allan Havemose" <havemose@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 10:22 PM
> Subject: Re: QP2 Directory limitation -- Janene
>
>
> > For an individual it inexpensive. I have the read/write kit and paid
> > something like $250 (maybe less - it's a while ago).
> >
> > Allan
> >
> > --- Lionel Issen <lissen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Maybe Equis is charging too much for this kit. Does anyone know?
> > > Lionel Issen
> > > lissen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Allan Havemose" <havemose@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 10:10 AM
> > > Subject: Re: QP2 Directory limitation -- Janene
> > >
> > >
> > > > The metastock developers kit supports 2000 file directories, so
> > > QP2's
> > > > explanation is not valid. Maybe Equis does not want to license the
> > > MSFL
> > > > kit to QP2, since they are a data competitor ?
> > > >
> > > > Allan
> > > >
> >
> >
> > =====
> > ---
> > Allan Havemose, Ph.D.
> > havemose@xxxxxxxxxx
> > havemose@xxxxxxxxx
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
> > http://auctions.yahoo.com/
>
> - ------=_NextPart_000_0016_01C0DF4C.242CD3C0
> Content-Type: text/html;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
> <HTML><HEAD>
> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
> charset=3Diso-8859-1">
> <META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4611.1300" name=3DGENERATOR>
> <STYLE></STYLE>
> </HEAD>
> <BODY>
> <DIV><SPAN class=3D130112308-18052001><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
> size=3D2>Please=20
> state the format used with SockWiz. Metastock can convert some=20
> formats.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
> <DIV class=3DOutlookMessageHeader><FONT face=3D"Times New Roman"=20
> size=3D2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> =
> owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx=20
> [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]<B>On Behalf Of</B>=20
> mj.cava<BR><B>Sent:</B> Friday, May 18, 2001 3:53 AM<BR><B>To:</B>=20
> metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: QP2 Directory limitation =
> - --=20
> Janene<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>FI</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>A 5 january 1999 comment from Steve=20
> Kalhas, i-Soft (Stockwiz)</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>" A lot of the StockWiz users want to =
> export data=20
> to the Metastock format but <STRONG>Equis refuses to license their =
> library to us=20
> because they said, we are competing with them on the data-sales =
> front</STRONG>.=20
> Given that our data prices are $9.95 per month and theirs are $30-$70, =
> etc., I=20
> think they got a point. "</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>----- Original Message ----- </FONT>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>From: "Allan Havemose" <</FONT><A=20
> href=3D"mailto:havemose@xxxxxxxxx";><FONT face=3DArial=20
> size=3D2>havemose@xxxxxxxxx</FONT></A><FONT face=3DArial =
> size=3D2>></FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>To: <</FONT><A=20
> href=3D"mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";><FONT face=3DArial=20
> size=3D2>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</FONT></A><FONT face=3DArial=20
> size=3D2>></FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 10:22 =
> PM</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Subject: Re: QP2 Directory limitation =
> - --=20
> Janene</FONT></DIV></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial><BR><FONT size=3D2></FONT></FONT></DIV><FONT =
> face=3DArial=20
> size=3D2>> For an individual it inexpensive. I have the read/write =
> kit and=20
> paid<BR>> something like $250 (maybe less - it's a while =
> ago).<BR>>=20
> <BR>> Allan<BR>> <BR>> --- Lionel Issen <</FONT><A=20
> href=3D"mailto:lissen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx";><FONT face=3DArial=20
> size=3D2>lissen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx</FONT></A><FONT face=3DArial =
> size=3D2>>=20
> wrote:<BR>> > Maybe Equis is charging too much for this kit. =
> Does=20
> anyone know?<BR>> > Lionel Issen<BR>> > </FONT><A=20
> href=3D"mailto:lissen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx";><FONT face=3DArial=20
> size=3D2>lissen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx</FONT></A><BR><FONT face=3DArial =
> size=3D2>> >=20
> - ----- Original Message ----- <BR>> > From: "Allan Havemose" =
> <</FONT><A=20
> href=3D"mailto:havemose@xxxxxxxxx";><FONT face=3DArial=20
> size=3D2>havemose@xxxxxxxxx</FONT></A><FONT face=3DArial =
> size=3D2>><BR>> >=20
> To: <</FONT><A href=3D"mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";><FONT =
> face=3DArial=20
> size=3D2>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</FONT></A><FONT face=3DArial =
> size=3D2>><BR>>=20
> > Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 10:10 AM<BR>> > Subject: Re: QP2 =
>
> Directory limitation -- Janene<BR>> > <BR>> > <BR>> > =
> > The=20
> metastock developers kit supports 2000 file directories, so<BR>> > =
>
> QP2's<BR>> > > explanation is not valid. Maybe Equis does not =
> want to=20
> license the<BR>> > MSFL<BR>> > > kit to QP2, since they =
> are a=20
> data competitor ?<BR>> > > <BR>> > > Allan<BR>> =
> > >=20
> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D<BR>> ---<BR>> Allan =
> Havemose,=20
> Ph.D.<BR>> </FONT><A href=3D"mailto:havemose@xxxxxxxxxx";><FONT =
> face=3DArial=20
> size=3D2>havemose@xxxxxxxxxx</FONT></A><BR><FONT face=3DArial =
> size=3D2>> </FONT><A=20
> href=3D"mailto:havemose@xxxxxxxxx";><FONT face=3DArial=20
> size=3D2>havemose@xxxxxxxxx</FONT></A><BR><FONT face=3DArial =
> size=3D2>> <BR>>=20
> __________________________________________________<BR>> Do You=20
> Yahoo!?<BR>> Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great=20
> prices<BR>> </FONT><A href=3D"http://auctions.yahoo.com/";><FONT =
> face=3DArial=20
> size=3D2>http://auctions.yahoo.com/</FONT></A> </BODY></HTML>
>
> - ------=_NextPart_000_0016_01C0DF4C.242CD3C0--
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 09:17:23 +0300
> From: Stavros Hadjichristofi <stavrosc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Gann and/or cycle analysis
>
> Dear all,
>
> I was wondering if you could recommend me a good Gann and/or cycle
analysis
> software.
>
> Thanking you in advance
>
> Stavros
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 16:06:26 -0500
> From: "Lionel Issen" <lissen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Cannot export custom indicators from Metastock v7.2 for use
with v7.03
>
> Would it work if you renamed the file to correspond to the name for a 7.03
> file?
> Lionel Issen
> lissen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> - ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Allan Havemose" <havemose@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 10:14 AM
> Subject: Re: Cannot export custom indicators from Metastock v7.2 for use
> with v7.03
>
>
> > Richard,
> >
> > My experience mirrors yours. I have never been able to import
> > indicators/systems generated with a newer (e.g 7.2) MS into an older
> > one (eg 7.03).
> >
> > Actually, even worse, if you have a backup/archive created by 6.5 and
> > you import it into 7.03, the backup will be "marked" as 7.03 and never
> > again be importable into 6.5. This problem may have been fixed in 7.2
> > (I reported it), but make sure you have a backup of your archive before
> > importing it into a newer metastock
> >
> > Allan
> >
> > --- Richard Dale <rad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Hello Equis & Everybody,
> > >
> > > I cannot export custom indicators from Metastock v7.2 for use with
> > > Metastock
> > > v7.0 or below.... it creates a file called MS72FORM.DTA which
> > > Metastock
> > > v7.03 does not pick up when I choose a source folder in the
> > > organizer.
> > >
> > > So, for indicators I want to distribute, it would seem that I must
> > > generate
> > > them in Metastock v6.5 then import them into all other versions.
> > >
> > > Has anybody else had any luck with importing from other versions?
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > RICHARD DALE
> > > IT PROJECTS MANAGER
> > > daytraderHQ Ltd
> > > Level 4, 66 Kings Park Rd
> > > West Perth
> > > Western Australia 6005
> > > Phone: (08) 9226 0767 Fax (08) 9322 9998
> > > Email: rad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Web site: www.daytraderHQ.com
> > > YOU'LL NEVER TRADE ALONE
> >
> >
> > =====
> > ---
> > Allan Havemose, Ph.D.
> > havemose@xxxxxxxxxx
> > havemose@xxxxxxxxx
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
> > http://auctions.yahoo.com/
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 16:03:14 -0500
> From: "Lionel Issen" <lissen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Confused
>
> David:
>
> Good advice. I have made both kinds of errors.
>
> A relative had a serious financial problem. I suggested a solution. There
> were some upfront costs. The answer I got was the equivalent of "Do you
> know what shovels cost in this town?" After losing more money they finally
> bought the shovel.
> Lionel Issen
> lissen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> - ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Jennings" <DavidJennings@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 2:42 PM
> Subject: Re: Confused
>
>
> > I would point you all to these little Tales of the Budo:
> > http://www.gradeyourtrade.com/insight-basics.html
> > http://www.gradeyourtrade.com/insight-priorities.html
> >
> >
> > Hajime
> >
> > DJ
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Steve Karnish" <kernish@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 6:25 PM
> > Subject: Re: Confused
> >
> >
> > > John,
> > >
> > > Review your emails and please note, after sorting with the "from"
> button,
> > > that most "problem" post come from a very selective few. I honestly
> have
> > > trouble imagining how anyone can trade while writing endless emails
> about
> > > what a horrible product MS is.
> > >
> > > In fact, considering the endless hours of bashing that some folks
> consume
> > > writing these negative posts, my opinion is that they should move on
to
> > > another product. I know I put a loose dollar amount on what my time
is
> > > worth. It seems a few would rather complain and then, invest hundreds
> of
> > > hours structuring their complaints in MS posts. Since this is an
> > "investing
> > > forum", does it make sense to invest time in this black hole.
> > >
> > > I have no complaints. I use ESig and Pro and day/swing trade the
beans,
> > > wheat and the emini. EOD is just fine for the majority of my
mechanical
> > > trading. The real-time trading keeps me awake. Never, ever, not even
> > once,
> > > have i considered MS as a handicap to appreciating equity. I think
> those
> > > that complain the loudest, trade the least.
> > >
> > > I repeat, even though I've had my own issues, over 14 years of use, MS
> > (EOD
> > > or Pro) is the best bang for the money on the market. Show me
something
> > > better and I'll buy it.
> > >
> > > Take care,
> > >
> > > Steve Karnish, CTA
> > > Cedar Creek Trading
> > > http://www.cedarcreektrading.com
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "John Moore" <chartist1951@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 9:02 AM
> > > Subject: Confused
> > >
> > >
> > > > I've seen a ton of email concerning QuotesPlus and issues with
> > MetaStock.
> > > >
> > > > I'm too new to understand what's going on. About 2 weeks ago, I
> > installed
> > > > 7.2 and hooked up the Reuter's data feed. I don't have any of these
> > > problems
> > > > or at least I am not aware of them.
> > > >
> > > > Is there a MS/Reuters user that knows if I have issues with what
I've
> > > > purchased?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > John
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 23:47:09 +0100
> From: "David Jennings" <DavidJennings@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Confused
>
> Lionel,
> I don't heed this often enough. 'am just reading his book - maybe that
will
> help.
>
> - ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Lionel Issen" <lissen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2001 10:03 PM
> Subject: Re: Confused
>
>
> > David:
> >
> > Good advice. I have made both kinds of errors.
> >
> > A relative had a serious financial problem. I suggested a solution.
There
> > were some upfront costs. The answer I got was the equivalent of "Do you
> > know what shovels cost in this town?" After losing more money they
finally
> > bought the shovel.
> > Lionel Issen
> > lissen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "David Jennings" <DavidJennings@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 2:42 PM
> > Subject: Re: Confused
> >
> >
> > > I would point you all to these little Tales of the Budo:
> > > http://www.gradeyourtrade.com/insight-basics.html
> > > http://www.gradeyourtrade.com/insight-priorities.html
> > >
> > >
> > > Hajime
> > >
> > > DJ
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Steve Karnish" <kernish@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 6:25 PM
> > > Subject: Re: Confused
> > >
> > >
> > > > John,
> > > >
> > > > Review your emails and please note, after sorting with the "from"
> > button,
> > > > that most "problem" post come from a very selective few. I honestly
> > have
> > > > trouble imagining how anyone can trade while writing endless emails
> > about
> > > > what a horrible product MS is.
> > > >
> > > > In fact, considering the endless hours of bashing that some folks
> > consume
> > > > writing these negative posts, my opinion is that they should move on
> to
> > > > another product. I know I put a loose dollar amount on what my time
> is
> > > > worth. It seems a few would rather complain and then, invest
hundreds
> > of
> > > > hours structuring their complaints in MS posts. Since this is an
> > > "investing
> > > > forum", does it make sense to invest time in this black hole.
> > > >
> > > > I have no complaints. I use ESig and Pro and day/swing trade the
> beans,
> > > > wheat and the emini. EOD is just fine for the majority of my
> mechanical
> > > > trading. The real-time trading keeps me awake. Never, ever, not
even
> > > once,
> > > > have i considered MS as a handicap to appreciating equity. I think
> > those
> > > > that complain the loudest, trade the least.
> > > >
> > > > I repeat, even though I've had my own issues, over 14 years of use,
MS
> > > (EOD
> > > > or Pro) is the best bang for the money on the market. Show me
> something
> > > > better and I'll buy it.
> > > >
> > > > Take care,
> > > >
> > > > Steve Karnish, CTA
> > > > Cedar Creek Trading
> > > > http://www.cedarcreektrading.com
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "John Moore" <chartist1951@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 9:02 AM
> > > > Subject: Confused
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > I've seen a ton of email concerning QuotesPlus and issues with
> > > MetaStock.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm too new to understand what's going on. About 2 weeks ago, I
> > > installed
> > > > > 7.2 and hooked up the Reuter's data feed. I don't have any of
these
> > > > problems
> > > > > or at least I am not aware of them.
> > > > >
> > > > > Is there a MS/Reuters user that knows if I have issues with what
> I've
> > > > > purchased?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > John
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 19:01:02 -0400
> From: "neo" <neo1@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Personal Attacks
>
> This list would be much more pleasant if we could all avoid personal
> attacks.
>
> neo
>
>
> - -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of John Moore
> Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 3:17 PM
> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Lionel Issen - You've Become A Dreadful Bore
>
>
> My God man, what is driving you? It's apparent that you want to pay
> excursion fees and go first class. If you want a good product, why not buy
> 7.2 and their data feed? Why insist on hybrids and trying to hold EQUIS's
> feet to the fire for their inadequacies? Your bashing of QuotesPlus is a
> disgrace! I just read a post where you want StockWhiz to work, are you
> kidding?
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 19:12:39 -0500
> From: Gene Ricci <genr@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: MACD Indicators
>
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
> - ------=_NextPart_000_06B7_01C0E097.ABB938A0
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> Does anyone know the definiton of MACD (TEMA smoothed) and MACD (DEMA =
> smoothed)?
>
> Thanks,
> Gene
>
> - ------=_NextPart_000_06B7_01C0E097.ABB938A0
> Content-Type: text/html;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
> <HTML><HEAD>
> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
> charset=3Diso-8859-1">
> <META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4522.1800" name=3DGENERATOR>
> <STYLE></STYLE>
> </HEAD>
> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">Does anyone know the definiton of MACD =
> (TEMA=20
> smoothed) and MACD (DEMA smoothed)?</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">Thanks,</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">Gene</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
>
> - ------=_NextPart_000_06B7_01C0E097.ABB938A0--
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 17:52:49 -0700
> From: Daniel Martinez <DanM@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Personal Attacks
>
> Keep in mind this person has only had MetaStock EOD for "about 2 weeks."
I
> don't think you need to worry too much about he has to say. ;^)
>
> Daniel.
>
>
> neo wrote:
>
> > This list would be much more pleasant if we could all avoid personal
> > attacks.
> >
> > neo
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of John Moore
> > Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 3:17 PM
> > To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Lionel Issen - You've Become A Dreadful Bore
> >
> > My God man, what is driving you? It's apparent that you want to pay
> > excursion fees and go first class. If you want a good product, why not
buy
> > 7.2 and their data feed? Why insist on hybrids and trying to hold
EQUIS's
> > feet to the fire for their inadequacies? Your bashing of QuotesPlus is a
> > disgrace! I just read a post where you want StockWhiz to work, are you
> > kidding?
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 19:53:54 -0700
> From: "Steve Karnish" <kernish@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: MACD Indicators
>
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
> - ------=_NextPart_000_004F_01C0E09D.6F2A3BE0
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> Gene,
>
> Substitute the "numbers" to suit your needs:
>
> shortperiods:=3DInput("Enter the shorter DEMA periods: ",3,21,13);
> longperiods:=3DInput("Enter the longer DEMA periods: ",21,55,34);
> signal:=3DInput("Enter the number of signal line periods: ",3,55,8);
> Dema(C,shortperiods)-Dema(C,longperiods);
> Mov(Dema(C,shortperiods)-Dema(C,longperiods),signal,E)
>
> Steve Karnish, CTA
> Cedar Creek Trading
> http://www.cedarcreektrading.com
> ----- Original Message -----=20
> From: Gene Ricci=20
> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx=20
> Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2001 5:12 PM
> Subject: MACD Indicators
>
>
> Does anyone know the definiton of MACD (TEMA smoothed) and MACD (DEMA =
> smoothed)?
> =20
> Thanks,
> Gene
>
> - ------=_NextPart_000_004F_01C0E09D.6F2A3BE0
> Content-Type: text/html;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
> <HTML><HEAD>
> <META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" =
> http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
> <META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2919.6307" name=3DGENERATOR>
> <STYLE></STYLE>
> </HEAD>
> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Gene,</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Substitute the "numbers" to suit your=20
> needs:</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>shortperiods:=3DInput("Enter the =
> shorter DEMA=20
> periods: ",3,21,13);<BR>longperiods:=3DInput("Enter the longer =
> DEMA=20
> periods: ",21,55,34);<BR>signal:=3DInput("Enter the number of =
> signal line=20
> periods: =20
> ",3,55,8);<BR>Dema(C,shortperiods)-Dema(C,longperiods);<BR>Mov(Dema(C,sho=
> rtperiods)-Dema(C,longperiods),signal,E)</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Steve Karnish, CTA<BR>Cedar Creek =
> Trading<BR><A=20
> href=3D"http://www.cedarcreektrading.com";>http://www.cedarcreektrading.co=
> m</A></FONT></DIV>
> <BLOCKQUOTE=20
> style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: =
> 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
> <DIV=20
> style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
> black"><B>From:</B>=20
> <A href=3D"mailto:genr@xxxxxxxxxx"; title=3Dgenr@xxxxxxxxxx>Gene =
> Ricci</A> </DIV>
> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A=20
> href=3D"mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx"=20
> title=3Dmetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A> </DIV>
> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Saturday, May 19, 2001 =
> 5:12=20
> PM</DIV>
> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> MACD Indicators</DIV>
> <DIV><BR></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">Does anyone know the definiton of =
> MACD (TEMA=20
> smoothed) and MACD (DEMA smoothed)?</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">Thanks,</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans =
> MS">Gene</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
>
> - ------=_NextPart_000_004F_01C0E09D.6F2A3BE0--
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 07:59:04 -0500
> From: Gene Ricci <genr@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: MACD Indicators
>
> Steve, many thanks.
>
> - ----- Original Message -----
> From: Steve Karnish
> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2001 9:53 PM
> Subject: Re: MACD Indicators
>
>
> Gene,
>
> Substitute the "numbers" to suit your needs:
>
> shortperiods:=Input("Enter the shorter DEMA periods: ",3,21,13);
> longperiods:=Input("Enter the longer DEMA periods: ",21,55,34);
> signal:=Input("Enter the number of signal line periods: ",3,55,8);
> Dema(C,shortperiods)-Dema(C,longperiods);
> Mov(Dema(C,shortperiods)-Dema(C,longperiods),signal,E)
>
> Steve Karnish, CTA
> Cedar Creek Trading
> http://www.cedarcreektrading.com
> - ----- Original Message -----
> From: Gene Ricci
> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2001 5:12 PM
> Subject: MACD Indicators
>
>
> Does anyone know the definiton of MACD (TEMA smoothed) and MACD (DEMA
> smoothed)?
>
> Thanks,
> Gene
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 10:00:47 -0400
> From: Herman van den Bergen <psytek@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Web/Email Course in MS programming?
>
> I would like to improve my MS programming skills, are there any on-the-web
> or email courses (free or for fee) available?
>
> Thanks,
> Herman
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 09:07:50 -0500
> From: "Tom Sprunger" <tlsprunger@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: MACD Indicators
>
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
> - ------=_NextPart_000_018E_01C0E10C.58921640
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> Gene, the TEMA and DEMA are different methods for smoothing the MACD. =
> >From the Metastock Help files.
>
> DEMA
> "DEMA is an acronym that stands for Double Exponential Moving Average. =
> However, the name of this smoothing technique is a bit misleading in =
> that it is not simply a moving average of a moving average. It is a =
> unique composite of a single exponential moving average and a double =
> exponential moving average that provides less lag than either of the two =
> components individually. "
>
> TEMA
> "TEMA is an acronym that stands for Triple Exponential Moving Average. =
> However, the name of this smoothing technique is a bit misleading in =
> that it is not simply a moving average of a moving average of a moving =
> average. It is a unique composite of a single exponential moving =
> average, a double exponential moving average, and a triple exponential =
> moving average that provides less lag than either of the three =
> components individually. "
>
> Both were invented by Patrick Mulloy and are attempts to solve the below =
> per his quote.
> "Moving averages have a detrimental lag time that increases as the =
> moving average length increases. The solution is a modified version of =
> exponential smoothing with less lag time."
>
> Tom
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----=20
> From: Gene Ricci=20
> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx=20
> Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2001 7:12 PM
> Subject: MACD Indicators
>
>
> Does anyone know the definiton of MACD (TEMA smoothed) and MACD (DEMA =
> smoothed)?
>
> Thanks,
> Gene
>
> - ------=_NextPart_000_018E_01C0E10C.58921640
> Content-Type: text/html;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
> <HTML><HEAD>
> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
> charset=3Diso-8859-1">
> <META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4611.1300" name=3DGENERATOR>
> <STYLE></STYLE>
> </HEAD>
> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>Gene, the TEMA and DEMA are different methods for =
> smoothing=20
> the MACD. From the Metastock Help files.</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>DEMA</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>"DEMA is an acronym that stands for Double =
> Exponential Moving=20
> Average. However, the name of this smoothing technique is a bit =
> misleading=20
> in that it is not simply a moving average of a moving average. It =
> is a=20
> unique composite of a single exponential moving average and a double =
> exponential=20
> moving average that provides less lag than either of the two components=20
> individually. "</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>TEMA</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>"TEMA is an acronym that stands for Triple =
> Exponential Moving=20
> Average. However, the name of this smoothing technique is a bit =
> misleading=20
> in that it is not simply a moving average of a moving average of a =
> moving=20
> average. It is a unique composite of a single exponential moving =
> average,=20
> a double exponential moving average, and a triple exponential moving =
> average=20
> that provides less lag than either of the three components individually. =
>
> "</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>Both were invented by Patrick Mulloy and are =
> attempts to solve=20
> the below per his quote.</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>"Moving averages have a detrimental lag time that =
> increases as=20
> the moving average length increases. The solution is a modified version =
> of=20
> exponential smoothing with less lag time."</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>Tom</DIV>
> <DIV><BR></DIV></FONT>
> <BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
> style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
> BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
> <DIV=20
> style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
> black"><B>From:</B>=20
> <A title=3Dgenr@xxxxxxxxxx href=3D"mailto:genr@xxxxxxxxxx";>Gene =
> Ricci</A> </DIV>
> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
> title=3Dmetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx=20
> href=3D"mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A> =
> </DIV>
> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Saturday, May 19, 2001 =
> 7:12=20
> PM</DIV>
> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> MACD Indicators</DIV>
> <DIV><BR></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">Does anyone know the definiton of =
> MACD (TEMA=20
> smoothed) and MACD (DEMA smoothed)?</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">Thanks,</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans =
> MS">Gene</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
>
> - ------=_NextPart_000_018E_01C0E10C.58921640--
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 01:49:42 +0530
> From: "Dr. R.BHANJA" <bhanjar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: TEMA Function
>
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
> - ------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C0E198.4E1D5E40
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> Hi !
> Can any body explain what is the "TEMA" indicator. What does it and what =
> is it's formula?
> Bhanja
>
> - ------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C0E198.4E1D5E40
> Content-Type: text/html;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
> <HTML><HEAD>
> <META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" =
> http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
> <META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2314.1000" name=3DGENERATOR>
> <STYLE></STYLE>
> </HEAD>
> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Hi !</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Can any body explain what is the "TEMA" =
> indicator.=20
> What does it and what is it's formula?</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Bhanja</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
>
> - ------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C0E198.4E1D5E40--
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of metastock-digest V1 #1344
> ********************************
>
|