|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Ditto. W98 SE not so bad. WinMe is a joke.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Theo Lockefeer" <sky40912@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 4:17 PM
Subject: Re: AMD System with Metastock?
> For me W95 was horrible, W98 not so bad,
> W2K : it looks like ms finally is able to build a stable
> OS.
>
> Theo L.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Robert" <robert_h@xxxxxxx>
> To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 3:54 PM
> Subject: Re: AMD System with Metastock?
>
>
> > I have MetaStock with AMD chip set. The chip set is rarly the problem if
> you
> > puchase your computer from an established dealer. I have used AMD for
> years
> > as well as Intell and never had a problem related to the chips. The OS
is
> > another matter Win98 was the worst OS MicroSoft ever sold. Get Windows
> > NT/2000/Me and you should be OK with AMD or Intel.
> >
> > regards
> > Robert H.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Holland" <hwrichards@xxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 5:42 AM
> > Subject: Re: AMD System with Metastock?
> >
> >
> > > John,
> > >
> > > I am running Metastock on a 400 MH AMD WIN98 with out problem. Do not
> > > remember a fault on Metastock.
> > >
> > > Holland
> > >
> > > > John Sellers wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I now use Windows 98 and Metastock on a Pentium system.
> > > >
> > > > My question is are they any of you using Metastock and Windows 98
> > > > with an AMD computer system?
> > > >
> > > > My system is old, slow and fails with page faults often; so I am
> > > > thinking about purchasing a new system. I wish to have confirming
> > > > inputs that some are successfully using Metastock on the AMD system
> > > > before considering an AMD system versus the Pentium system.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for your inputs.
> > >
> >
> >
>
|