|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Chris,
The only dumb question I know is the one to which one already knows the
answer.<G>
Rgds
Frans
At 10:54 1-11-00 EST, you wrote:
>I certainly do not want to be negative or keep any negativity alive but ...
>IMHO the issue is not related to technical disagreements. It seems to me
that
>it is much more related to civilness, humaness ...
>Forums like this are designed for exchanges of ideas, preferably in a civil
>and nurturing manner. When people are criticized, rebuked and called nasty
>names for asking a question or giving their opinion, there is a tendency to
>stifle a lot of other peoples contributions.
>I am not trying to keep this going, just trying to ensure the issue is
>defined properly.
>I feel that the best way for me to contribute is to ask the dumb questions
>that everybody else is too embarassed to ask. So ... let me go think of some
>really dumb questions now. Any ideas from any one? :)
>Chris
>
>In a message dated Wed, 1 Nov 2000 6:48:35 AM Eastern Standard Time,
>"Vignesh" <vignesh@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
><< Hey, lets just get on with it ok? whoever is at fault, there is a lot more
>to be gained by exchange of good ideas (how will one know something is good
>unless there is something less good to compare it with?) and a whole lot to
>be learnt.
>
>Lets all continue to make this a good active vibrant and intelligent forum.
>
>
>Vignesh
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Daniel Martinez <DanM@xxxxxxxxxx>
>To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 7:13 AM
>Subject: Re: Too much for me
>
>
>> I wouldn't worry about it. As long as Equis's MetaStock program is
>popular,
>> there will be a MetaStock ListServ. The only way this List will disappear
>> would be if no one purchased the product any more. There will always be
>> changeovers in people for whatever reasons. Some will go broke, some will
>move
>> on to better programs, some will find better forums such as Silicon
>Investor,
>> etc...
>>
>> Let's just ignore the negative and focus on building our skills in
>MetaStock
>> and TA in general. I have much to contribute and learn. I know others
>here
>> will do the same.
>>
>> Daniel.
>>
>>
>> Ron Scott wrote:
>>
>> > This is exactly what I've been thinking would happen, that people would
>be
>> > driven off or leave in disgust. This list of traders has been ruined by
>the
>> > few who can't handle the fact that others have different views.
>Complaining
>> > to Equis about the problem didn't do any good, so maybe you should go.
>> > There is a very uncomfortable feeling about this list, and posting to it
>> > takes almost as much guts as making a trade! But at least you won't
>find
>> > support for an unprofitable idea! hahaha However, there are some very
>> > smart and nice people on the list, I guess they just have developed a
>thick
>> > skin.
>> >
>> > Ron Scott
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Mark Thompson
>> > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 7:57 AM
>> > To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > Subject: Too much for me
>> >
>> > Would someone please tell me where I can sign up for realtraders? I
>can't
>> > take this anymore. It is time to make a switch.
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: <Mullin285@xxxxxxx>
>> > To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 7:12 PM
>> > Subject: Re: Blind bats, old ladies, and one giant turd.
>> >
>> > > I have to agree, sad to say. I feel many folks are probably nervous
>about
>> > > getting whiplashed by some of the vicious, obnoxiousness that often
>times
>> > > stinks up so many posts on this list.
>>
>
> >>
>
>
>
|