|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I certainly do not want to be negative or keep any negativity alive but ...
IMHO the issue is not related to technical disagreements. It seems to me that
it is much more related to civilness, humaness ...
Forums like this are designed for exchanges of ideas, preferably in a civil
and nurturing manner. When people are criticized, rebuked and called nasty
names for asking a question or giving their opinion, there is a tendency to
stifle a lot of other peoples contributions.
I am not trying to keep this going, just trying to ensure the issue is
defined properly.
I feel that the best way for me to contribute is to ask the dumb questions
that everybody else is too embarassed to ask. So ... let me go think of some
really dumb questions now. Any ideas from any one? :)
Chris
In a message dated Wed, 1 Nov 2000 6:48:35 AM Eastern Standard Time,
"Vignesh" <vignesh@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
<< Hey, lets just get on with it ok? whoever is at fault, there is a lot more
to be gained by exchange of good ideas (how will one know something is good
unless there is something less good to compare it with?) and a whole lot to
be learnt.
Lets all continue to make this a good active vibrant and intelligent forum.
Vignesh
----- Original Message -----
From: Daniel Martinez <DanM@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 7:13 AM
Subject: Re: Too much for me
> I wouldn't worry about it. As long as Equis's MetaStock program is
popular,
> there will be a MetaStock ListServ. The only way this List will disappear
> would be if no one purchased the product any more. There will always be
> changeovers in people for whatever reasons. Some will go broke, some will
move
> on to better programs, some will find better forums such as Silicon
Investor,
> etc...
>
> Let's just ignore the negative and focus on building our skills in
MetaStock
> and TA in general. I have much to contribute and learn. I know others
here
> will do the same.
>
> Daniel.
>
>
> Ron Scott wrote:
>
> > This is exactly what I've been thinking would happen, that people would
be
> > driven off or leave in disgust. This list of traders has been ruined by
the
> > few who can't handle the fact that others have different views.
Complaining
> > to Equis about the problem didn't do any good, so maybe you should go.
> > There is a very uncomfortable feeling about this list, and posting to it
> > takes almost as much guts as making a trade! But at least you won't
find
> > support for an unprofitable idea! hahaha However, there are some very
> > smart and nice people on the list, I guess they just have developed a
thick
> > skin.
> >
> > Ron Scott
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Mark Thompson
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 7:57 AM
> > To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Too much for me
> >
> > Would someone please tell me where I can sign up for realtraders? I
can't
> > take this anymore. It is time to make a switch.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <Mullin285@xxxxxxx>
> > To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 7:12 PM
> > Subject: Re: Blind bats, old ladies, and one giant turd.
> >
> > > I have to agree, sad to say. I feel many folks are probably nervous
about
> > > getting whiplashed by some of the vicious, obnoxiousness that often
times
> > > stinks up so many posts on this list.
>
>>
|