[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Advanced Get versus MetaStock



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links


No further comment from me is necessary. My best offense is to let you 
talk. 
 
 
 
----- Original Message ----- 
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr 
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV 
  style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From: 
  A.J. Maas 
  
  To: <A 
  href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx"; 
  title=metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 9:26 
  PM
  Subject: Re: Advanced Get versus 
  MetaStock
  
  Thanks for your contribution. It will be most helpfull 
  to the many.
   
  There are many ways that can lead one to the room of 
  glory.
  Even the monkeys are capable to make money throwing darts. 
  No big deal in that !!!.
   
  The incorrect Fibionancy-myth of  "figures being 
  relational to one another" has indeed here on
  the List been unraffled before, 
  including that of the further man-made-ajointed 
  myth of
  "mother nature wonders", that either <FONT 
  size=2>would be caused by it or that would be related to 
  the myth.
   
  The Mr. W. Bartjens Law shows a straight out correct 
  relation between the standard figures-set
  that was first introduced in the 10 Century, a set 
  that today is still in use, and the 
  Cyfferringe
  (that is the Law) also shows WHY the figures are TRUELY 
  related.
   
  The modern day Decimal** system, that is 
  directly based on the standard figures-set, provides
  -along with its Fractals-  the 
  natural relation and rythem between <FONT 
  size=2>figures.
   
  Apart from the Decimal system being the natural related 
  figures, it also has a  -now TRUE fair
  dinkom evidentual-  influencial effect 
  on humans on this globe that are all using it. 
  Easely the
  humans then refer to "halves", 
  "thirds", "quarters" and "tenths" of something :
      -"Oh it only costs halve the original 
  price"
      -"Profits have rissen one thirds compared 
  to last year"
      -"The quarterly 
  figures are............"
      -"It's only roughly been a ten percent 
  increase{rise}".
   
  Check the levels derived from splitting "a whole" 100 into 
  the Decimalic Fractals and then compare to
  and find that the from the 
  Fibionancy-myth calculated ones then "only come close to".
  That explains too why one can make money from the 
  Natural Human support and resistances found
  at the above 
  mentioned Fractal levels.
   
  That the Fibionancy-myth calculations then only can come 
  close to is perhaps benificial to you, but
  they are not ever based <FONT 
  size=2>on the mentioned "natural, relational, logical, 
  scientifical or on any other fact"
  that the myth also tries <FONT 
  size=2>out everyone to believe.
   
  Check out the previous sent Bartjens 
  mail(s) to find the 1st Group and mail 
  showing why they are related.
  Check the previous sent Fractals Retracements mail(s) to 
  find the Natural Human support + resistance
  levels equivelant for the financial markets.
   
  Then compare results to the Fibionancy-myth 
  and the myth is straight out 
  unraffled.
  Now place the Fractal Retracements on 
  your Charts and see why they work, and why the Fibionancies
  can only come close to, eg naturaly, 
  since that they are not "natural, relational, logical, 
  scientifical or
  on any other fact"-based or related.
   
  I will let you have the NEXT month to work this all 
  out and expect you to report back to the List with
  example Charts holding the BASED ON 
  FACTS Natural Human support & resistance levels.
   
  Then if you like, you may still post comparisson 
  results of your beloved Fibionancy vs the above.
  Doubt that anyone is interested in them after 
  seeing both versions, eg after they have seen
  "the Humans have prooven their point" 
  Fractal retracements.
   
  Oh, I forgot, seeing your mail's reference to you 
  trading Fibionancy as your major trading tool making
  50 or 100 trades/month (that would be only 900 
  (75*12) trades/yearly !!!!!!!!!) now let me refer to 
  some
  of my previously sent stunning trade 
  example mails.
  I only trade 50 or 100 trades/year (!!!!!) , most of 
  the time less, to achieve my b€loved goal$, and 
  do
  so trading REAL TA-tools.
   
  
  ** Decimal system:
      -------------------------
  Group 1 are the figures 1 up to 9 and where the 0 is niks, 
  nada.
  Group 2 are the follow up to 9 figures 10 to 19
  Group 3 are the follow up to 10 figures 20 to 
29
  etcetera etcetera.
  <FONT 
  size=2>
  Regards,Ton Maas<A 
  href="mailto:ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxDismiss 
  the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying.Homepage  <A 
  href="http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas";>http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas
   
   
  <BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr 
  style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
    ----- Oorspronkelijk bericht ----- 
    <DIV 
    style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">Van: 
    <A href="mailto:joeduffy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"; 
    title=joeduffy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>Joe Duffy 
    Aan: <A 
    href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx"; 
    title=metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    Verzonden: woensdag 18 oktober 2000 
    13:40
    Onderwerp: Re: Advanced Get versus 
    MetaStock
    
    <BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr 
    style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
      <BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr 
      style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
        
          A.J. Maas wrote;
           
          now based on the Fibionancy-myth, a myth 
          that here
          on the List also has been unraffled before.
          =================================
           
          I guess I have read the above from you once to often, so I will 
          comment. You may not be able to make money using Fibonacci. That has 
          no relation to its use in trading. 
           
          I use Fibonacci as my major trading tool. I make 50 to 100 trades 
          per month. I am willing to post a monthly statement, from NEXT month 
          if you like. If my Fibonacci based trades make money, you can submit a 
          $1K check to my favorite charity. If they don't, I will submit one to 
          yours.