[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Advanced Get versus MetaStock



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links


Thanks for your contribution. It will be most helpfull to 
the many.
 
There are many ways that can lead one to the room of 
glory.
Even the monkeys are capable to make money throwing darts. No 
big deal in that !!!.
 
The incorrect Fibionancy-myth of  "figures being 
relational to one another" has indeed here on
the List been unraffled before, 
including that of the further man-made-ajointed 
myth of
"mother nature wonders", that either would 
be caused by it or that would be related to the 
myth.
 
The Mr. W. Bartjens Law shows a straight out correct relation 
between the standard figures-set
that was first introduced in the 10 Century, a set 
that today is still in use, and the 
Cyfferringe
(that is the Law) also shows WHY the figures are TRUELY 
related.
 
The modern day Decimal** system, that is 
directly based on the standard figures-set, provides
-along with its Fractals-  the 
natural relation and rythem between figures<FONT 
size=2>.
 
Apart from the Decimal system being the natural related 
figures, it also has a  -now TRUE fair
dinkom evidentual-  influencial effect <FONT 
size=2>on humans on this globe that are all using it. Easely 
the
humans then refer to "halves", 
"thirds", "quarters" and "tenths" of something :
    -"Oh it only costs halve the original 
price"
    -"Profits have rissen one thirds compared 
to last year"
    -"The quarterly figures 
are............"
    -"It's only roughly been a ten percent 
increase{rise}".
 
Check the levels derived from splitting "a whole" 100 into the 
Decimalic Fractals and then compare to
and find that the from the 
Fibionancy-myth calculated ones then "only come close to".
That explains too why one can make money from the Natural 
Human support and resistances found
at the above mentioned 
Fractal levels.
 
That the Fibionancy-myth calculations then only can come close 
to is perhaps benificial to you, but
they are not ever based <FONT 
size=2>on the mentioned "natural, relational, logical, scientifical or 
on any other fact"
that the myth also tries <FONT 
size=2>out everyone to believe.
 
Check out the previous sent Bartjens mail(s) <FONT 
size=2>to find the 1st Group and mail showing why they are 
related.
Check the previous sent Fractals Retracements mail(s) to find 
the Natural Human support + resistance
levels equivelant for the financial markets.
 
Then compare results to the Fibionancy-myth 
and the myth is straight out 
unraffled.
Now place the Fractal Retracements on your 
Charts and see why they work, and why the Fibionancies
can only come close to, eg naturaly, since 
that they are not "natural, relational, logical, 
scientifical or
on any other fact"-based or related.
 
I will let you have the NEXT month to work this all 
out and expect you to report back to the List with
example Charts holding the BASED ON FACTS 
Natural Human support & resistance levels.
 
Then if you like, you may still post comparisson 
results of your beloved Fibionancy vs the above.
Doubt that anyone is interested in them after seeing both 
versions, eg after they have seen
"the Humans have prooven their point" 
Fractal retracements.
 
Oh, I forgot, seeing your mail's reference to you trading 
Fibionancy as your major trading tool making
50 or 100 trades/month (that would be only 900 
(75*12) trades/yearly !!!!!!!!!) now let me refer to 
some
of my previously sent stunning trade 
example mails.
I only trade 50 or 100 trades/year (!!!!!) , most of the 
time less, to achieve my b€loved goal$, and 
do
so trading REAL TA-tools.
 

** Decimal system:
    -------------------------
Group 1 are the figures 1 up to 9 and where the 0 is niks, 
nada.
Group 2 are the follow up to 9 figures 10 to 19
Group 3 are the follow up to 10 figures 20 to 29
etcetera etcetera.
<FONT 
size=2>
Regards,Ton Maas<A 
href="mailto:ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxDismiss the 
".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying.Homepage  <A 
href="http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas";>http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas
 
 
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr 
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  ----- Oorspronkelijk bericht ----- 
  <DIV 
  style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">Van: 
  <A title=joeduffy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  href="mailto:joeduffy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>Joe Duffy 
  Aan: <A title=metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Verzonden: woensdag 18 oktober 2000 
  13:40
  Onderwerp: Re: Advanced Get versus 
  MetaStock
  
  <BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr 
  style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
    <BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr 
    style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
      
        A.J. Maas wrote;
         
        now based on the Fibionancy-myth, a myth 
        that here
        on the List also has been unraffled before.
        =================================
         
        I guess I have read the above from you once to often, so I will 
        comment. You may not be able to make money using Fibonacci. That has no 
        relation to its use in trading. 
         
        I use Fibonacci as my major trading tool. I make 50 to 100 trades 
        per month. I am willing to post a monthly statement, from NEXT month if 
        you like. If my Fibonacci based trades make money, you can submit a $1K 
        check to my favorite charity. If they don't, I will submit one to yours.