RE: Advanced Get versus MetaStock

["Bob Jagow" <bjagow@xxxxxxx>]

I 
forwarded your unbiased recommendation to my trading group, 
Ton.
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2> 
They 
especially appreciate jokes on down days.<SPAN 
class=15220022-17102000>
<FONT face=Arial 
color=#0000ff>Your admirer,
<FONT face=Arial 
color=#0000ff>Bob
 
 -----Original 
Message-----From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of A.J. 
MaasSent: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 3:05 PMTo: 
Metastock-ListSubject: Re: Advanced Get versus 
MetaStock
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr 
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  Please let me take a shot at unraffling this Get-myth.
  MicroSoft(MS) doesn't market or creates any TA or EWAVE 
  software(sw).
  MetaStocK(MSK) also doesn't make or includes any EWAVE counts or 
  sw.
   
  
  I would like to see examples where this $2000+ sw package did give 
  you
  the exact EWAVE counts? Eg TRUE examples.
  Get is known to make attempts at it, but the sw 
  package fails hopelessly in delivering.
  Not surprisingly, since its counts are not true Elliot counts but counts 
  based on a mix
  that includes Elliot wave counts now based on the 
  Fibionancy-myth, a myth that here
  on the List also has been unraffled before.
   
  The option to plot the MACD in Histogram style is included in your MSK 
  software. 
  (<right click> the MACD for Properties and <click> 
  the wavy Bars option).
  You're also enabled in MetaStocK to create any custom version of the 
  MACD or any
  other indicator. Am sure it is one of the many MACD versions that 
  have been
  posted to the List before.
   
  Can you give some TRUE examples where this $2000+ sw package did give 
  you
  the exact "next LOW's" ? Eg valid examples and/with 
  examples showing that Eclipse.
  Get is known to 
  only forcast "way-off" LOW's.
   
  $2000+ for a simple sw package is a rip-off, for a 
  non-delivering sw package its
  is plain rip-off and not the time worth spend on it.
  A quick calculation:
  one(1) complete single PC + OS sw + MSK sw installed costs less 
  then $2000 and
  on the contrairy, DOES DELIVER on expectations.
  <FONT 
  size=2>Regards,Ton Maas<A 
  href="mailto:ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxDismiss 
  the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying.Homepage  <A 
  href="http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas";>http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas
   
   
  <BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr 
  style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
    ----- Oorspronkelijk bericht ----- 
    <DIV 
    style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">Van: 
    Songyun Fox 

    Aan: <A title=metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    Verzonden: dinsdag 17 oktober 2000 
    0:35
    Onderwerp: Re: Advanced Get versus 
    MetaStock
    Hi Gene. Please let me take a shot at 
    your question.  MS does not offer any form of Elliott wave 
    counts.  GET does.  GET offers a unique form of the MACD, in 
    histogram form. GET helps locate the next LOW if your peaking in price. 
    called an ellipse indicator I believe. 
    Other goodies, but I don't own it.  $2,000 is 
    alot for a piece of software. But,  if someone wants to buy me one, I'd 
    be very pleased. My opinion. 
    Bud Fox 
    Gene Ricci wrote: 
    
      
      I see a lot of MS owners using Advanced Get as 
      well. I would appreciate if someone could enlighten me as to why one would 
      use both. Thanks,<FONT 
      face="Comic Sans MS">Gene