[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Advanced Get versus MetaStock



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links


Please let me take a shot at unraffling this Get-myth.
MicroSoft(MS) doesn't market or creates any TA or EWAVE 
software(sw).
MetaStocK(MSK) also doesn't make or includes any EWAVE counts or 
sw.
 

I would like to see examples where this $2000+ sw package did give 
you
the exact EWAVE counts? Eg TRUE examples.
Get is known to make attempts at it, but the sw 
package fails hopelessly in delivering.
Not surprisingly, since its counts are not true Elliot counts but counts 
based on a mix
that includes Elliot wave counts now based on the 
Fibionancy-myth, a myth that here
on the List also has been unraffled before.
 
The option to plot the MACD in Histogram style is included in your MSK 
software. 
(<right click> the MACD for Properties and <click> 
the wavy Bars option).
You're also enabled in MetaStocK to create any custom version of the 
MACD or any
other indicator. Am sure it is one of the many MACD versions that have 
been
posted to the List before.
 
Can you give some TRUE examples where this $2000+ sw package did give 
you
the exact "next LOW's" ? Eg valid examples and/with 
examples showing that Eclipse.
Get is known to 
only forcast "way-off" LOW's.
 
$2000+ for a simple sw package is a rip-off, for a non-delivering 
sw package its
is plain rip-off and not the time worth spend on it.
A quick calculation:
one(1) complete single PC + OS sw + MSK sw installed costs less 
then $2000 and
on the contrairy, DOES DELIVER on expectations.
<FONT 
size=2>Regards,Ton Maas<A 
href="mailto:ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxDismiss the 
".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying.Homepage  <A 
href="http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas";>http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas
 
 
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr 
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  ----- Oorspronkelijk bericht ----- 
  <DIV 
  style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">Van: 
  Songyun Fox 
  Aan: <A title=metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Verzonden: dinsdag 17 oktober 2000 
  0:35
  Onderwerp: Re: Advanced Get versus 
  MetaStock
  Hi Gene. Please let me take a shot at your 
  question.  MS does not offer any form of Elliott wave counts.  GET 
  does.  GET offers a unique form of the MACD, in histogram form. GET helps 
  locate the next LOW if your peaking in price. called an ellipse indicator I 
  believe. 
  Other goodies, but I don't own it.  $2,000 is alot 
  for a piece of software. But,  if someone wants to buy me one, I'd be 
  very pleased. My opinion. 
  Bud Fox 
  Gene Ricci wrote: 
  
    
    I see a lot of MS owners using Advanced Get as 
    well. I would appreciate if someone could enlighten me as to why one would 
    use both. Thanks,<FONT 
    face="Comic Sans MS">Gene