[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Modified 50 Day Moving Average



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

A.J.
Thanks for the new indicator. It works fine. Do you know if it is possible to write an indicator that draw up to 300 MA in an
chart. From 2 days upp to 300 days.
Best regard.
Lars Widlund

"A.J. Maas" skrev:

> Lars, see a repost of a repost below...................
>
> You should use the last version (000222) that was sent to the List
> and that's also printed further below. Copy+Paste will do.
>
> Regards,
> Ton Maas
> ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Dismiss the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying.
> Homepage  http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas
>
> ----- Oorspronkelijk bericht -----
> Van: "Lars Widlund"
> Aan: A.J. Maas
> Verzonden: zondag 15 oktober 2000 12:19
> Onderwerp: Modified 50 Day Moving Average
>
> > Hi.
> > Copy your formual for the Modified 50 Day Moving Average from
> > http://www.nt-tech.com.au/guppy/gup155.htm but it doesn´t work.
> > I got the message "Too many numeric constants defined in formula.
> > Therefore I wonder what have I done wrong? How did you get it to work?
> >
> > Best regard.
> > Lars Widlund
> > PS.
> > I use Metastock 6.52
> > DS
> >
> >
>
> Larry,
> See a re-post down below.
>
> Regards,
> Ton Maas
> ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Dismiss the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying.
> Homepage  http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Larry"
> To: A.J. Maas
> Sent: woensdag 19 juli 2000 8:16
> Subject: Modified 50-day moving average
>
> > Hi ton. I enjoy reading your posts on the Metastock mailing list. I just
> > went to the Guppy site and attempted to copy and paste your mdoified
> > moving average into the indicator builder. The software kept refusing to
> > accept all of it claiming it was too many numerals. I've never seen that
> > kind of message before. I use the end of day version 7.02. Thanking you
> > for your help in advance.
> >
> > by the way, I write, edit and publish a weekly international stock
> > market newsletter. Attached is last week's issue.
> >
> ===================================================
>
> You should use the last version(20000222) that was sent to the List
> and that's also printed below. Copy+Paste will do.
>
> Regards,
> Ton Maas
> ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Dismiss the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying.
> Homepage  http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas
>
> Name:
> Multiple Moving Averages Averaged - Linda Bradford Raschke
>
> Formula:
> {written by Ton Maas-20000222 for use in MetaStock v6.5+}
>
> DN:=1;
> HN:=2;
> HN3:=DN+HN;
> HN4:=HN+HN;
> HN5:=HN+HN+DN;
> HN6:=HN+HN+HN;
> HN7:=HN+HN+HN+DN;
> n:=50;
> sOne:=((n-DN)/HN)*C+
>     ((n-HN3)/HN)*Ref(C,-DN)+
>     ((n-HN5)/HN)*Ref(C,-HN)+
>     ((n-HN7)/HN)*Ref(C,-HN3)+
>     ((n-(HN7+HN))/HN)*Ref(C,-HN4)+
>     ((n-(HN7+HN4))/HN)*Ref(C,-HN5)+
>     ((n-(HN7+HN6))/HN)*Ref(C,-HN6)+
>     ((n-(HN5*HN3))/HN)*Ref(C,-HN7)+
>     ((n-(HN5*HN3+HN)/HN)*Ref(C,-HN*HN4)+
>     ((n-(HN5*HN3+HN4))/HN)*Ref(C,-HN3*HN3)+
>     ((n-(HN5*HN4+DN))/HN)*Ref(C,-HN*HN5)+
>     ((n-(HN5*HN4+HN3))/HN)*Ref(C,-HN*HN5+DN)+
>     ((n-(HN5*HN5))/HN)*Ref(C,-HN3*HN4)+
>     ((n-(HN5*HN5+HN))/HN)*Ref(C,-HN3*HN4+DN)+
>     ((n-29)/HN)*Ref(C,-HN3*HN4+HN)+
>     ((n-31)/HN)*Ref(C,-HN3*HN5)+
>     ((n-33)/HN)*Ref(C,-HN3*HN5+DN)+
>     ((n-35)/HN)*Ref(C,-HN3*HN5+HN)+
>     ((n-37)/HN)*Ref(C,-HN3*HN6)+
>     ((n-39)/HN)*Ref(C,-HN3*HN6+DN)+
>     ((n-41)/HN)*Ref(C,-HN4*HN5)+
>     ((n-43)/HN)*Ref(C,-HN4*HN5+DN)+
>     ((n-45)/HN)*Ref(C,-HN4*HN5+HN)+
>     ((n-47)/HN)*Ref(C,-HN4*HN5+HN3)+
>     ((n-49)/HN)*Ref(C,-HN4*HN6)+
>     ((n-51)/HN)*Ref(C,-HN5*HN5)+
>     ((n-53)/HN)*Ref(C,-HN5*HN5+DN)+
>     ((n-55)/HN)*Ref(C,-HN5*HN5+HN)+
>     ((n-57)/HN)*Ref(C,-HN4*HN7)+
>     ((n-59)/HN)*Ref(C,-HN4*HN7+DN)+
>     ((n-61)/HN)*Ref(C,-HN6*HN5)+
>     ((n-63)/HN)*Ref(C,-HN6*HN5+DN)+
>     ((n-65)/HN)*Ref(C,-HN6*HN5+HN)+
>     ((n-67)/HN)*Ref(C,-HN6*HN5+HN3)+
>     ((n-69)/HN)*Ref(C,-HN6*HN5+HN4)+
>     ((n-71)/HN)*Ref(C,-HN5*HN7)+
>     ((n-73)/HN)*Ref(C,-HN6*HN6)+
>     ((n-75)/HN)*Ref(C,-HN6*HN6+DN)+
>     ((n-77)/HN)*Ref(C,-HN6*HN6+HN)+
>     ((n-79)/HN)*Ref(C,-HN6*HN6+HN3)+
>     ((n-81)/HN)*Ref(C,-HN6*HN6+HN4)+
>     ((n-83)/HN)*Ref(C,-HN6*HN6+HN5)+
>     ((n-85)/HN)*Ref(C,-HN7*HN6)+
>     ((n-87)/HN)*Ref(C,-HN7*HN6+DN)+
>     ((n-89)/HN)*Ref(C,-HN7*HN6+HN)+
>     ((n-91)/HN)*Ref(C,-HN7*HN6+HN3)+
>     ((n-93)/HN)*Ref(C,-HN7*HN6+HN4)+
>     ((n-95)/HN)*Ref(C,-HN7*HN6+HN5)+
>     ((n-97)/HN)*Ref(C,-HN7*HN6+HN6)+
>     ((n-99)/HN)*Ref(C,-HN7*HN7));
> TN:=Mov(C,n,S);
> yTwo:=TN+(HN6*sOne)/((n+DN)*n);
> yTwo
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Henry Kaczmarczyk"
> To: "Ton Maas"
> Sent: donderdag 8 juni 2000 1:45
> Subject: Modified Moving average 50 day
>
> > when I try to cut and paste your formula I get a
> > message that there are too many numeric constants. I
> > can't get this formula to work with more than 25 days
> > any suggestions?
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Photos -- now, 100 FREE prints!
> > http://photos.yahoo.com
> >