|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><html>
Ed,<br>
<br>
I don't think speed is a problem if you use rewritable media as software
such as Adaptec's Direct CD which treats the burner as another drive so
it is just like writing to a floppy.<br>
<br>
If you are burning to CD-R then yes you must have a continuos stream of
data or you end up with a coaster. Burning speed can be adjusted - the
lower the speed the more accurate is the burn.<br>
<br>
Audio - CD-R only<br>
<br>
George.<br>
<br>
At 19:41 02/04/2000 -0400, you wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite cite><font face="arial" size=2>Sorry for the off
topic post but my tape backup (Iomega Ditto) system is on the fritz for
the second time this year. I would like to get rid of it and backup
my downloaded data on a CD-RW but I have a few questions I hope someone
can answer:</font><br>
<br>
<font face="arial" size=2>1. I have a Pentium 120 system with 48
Meg of Ram. Most of the newer CD-RW specify at least a Pentium 233
with 32 Meg of Ram. My understanding is that once the CD is being
burned that it must have a continuous stream of data even with the 4 meg
of buffer in the CD-RW. Will my system have a problem supplying the
data or will it just run slower than the specified 8X write, 4X
rewrite? If it does run slower do I need to tell the recorder to
run at a slower speed or will it automatically adjust?</font><br>
<br>
<font face="arial" size=2>2. Secondly, sorry if this is a basic
question, can the cd-RW recorder produce audio CD's for playing in
standard portable CD players? I think that it can but only on CD-R
disks and not on CD-RW disks. Is that correct?</font><br>
<br>
<font face="arial" size=2>thanks in advance, </font><br>
<br>
<font face="arial" size=2>Ed Middleton</font><br>
<br>
</blockquote><br>
</html>
</x-html>From ???@??? Mon Apr 03 09:29:16 2000
Return-Path: <majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from listserv.equis.com (listserv.equis.com [204.246.137.2])
by purebytes.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA32114
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 04:55:12 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id FAA24720
for metastock-outgoing; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 05:11:00 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id FAA24717
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 05:10:57 -0600
Received: from hme0.mailrouter04.sprint.ca (itac-sun-13.sprint.ca [207.107.250.17])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA24732
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 05:21:51 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from default (spc-isp-mtl-58-4-210.sprint.ca [149.99.137.210])
by hme0.mailrouter04.sprint.ca (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id HAA20373
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 07:05:25 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <002d01bf9d5c$6d567d40$d2896395@xxxxxxx>
From: "Walter Lake" <wlake@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20000330230427.22980.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <003101bf9ca8$68813440$8a2367d1@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Market Profile Liquidity Data Bank
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 07:04:46 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
Hi CMA
Now I'm really confused. I just received this from CBOT
===============
"... Large firms usually have full memberships which would require a Cti2.
>>> "Walter Lake" <wlake@xxxxxxxxx> 03/31 6:19 AM >>>
Hi
In your Liquidity Data Bank data, where are the large commodity funds
placed? In category Cti1, Cti2, Cti3, or Cti4? ..."
==================
Best regards
Walter
----- Original Message -----
From: "Walter Lake" <wlake@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, April 02, 2000 9:36 AM
Subject: Re: Market Profile Liquidity Data Bankd
| Hi CMA and others who wrote
|
| It doesn't sound logical for the large commodity funds to be included in
the
| commercials category. I had assumed that the funds were in Cti#3.
|
| I got the following note back from CISCO futures who are really into this
| type of data.
|
| ==============
|
| "... March 31, 2000
|
| Mr. Lake:
|
| Large (and small) commodity funds normally trade though CTI 1.
|
| The larger ones may have a membership and hence would be eligible
| to trade as CTI 3. However, we have seen little evidence of this
| happening. ..."
|
| ===========
|
| This is a problem.
|
| Floor traders aren't going to end up with a net position to hold over
night.
| So logically, it sounds right. (see distant month beans attachment)
|
| But ... the net of the Cti#1 categories for the different months doesn't
| match the net fund position listed in the different commodity reports that
I
| get nightly. Not even close most nights.
|
| All I have to do is figure why the numbers don't match
|
| Any suggestions would be appreciated.
|
| Best regards
|
| Walter
|
|
| ----- Original Message -----
| From: "CMA" <cma6@xxxxxxxxx>
| To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2000 7:04 PM
| Subject: Market Profile Liquidity Data Bankd
|
|
| |
| | Hi Walter:
| | CBOT has 4 classifications of market participants:
| | CT1--local floor traders
| | CT2-- commercial clearing members
| | CT3--members filling orders for other members and for non-clearing
| | commericial traders.
| | CT4--members filling orders ofr the public or for any other type of
| customer.
| |
| | So I would say that the large commodity funds are in CT2.
| | Hope this helps, CMA
| |
| | __________________________________________________
| | Do You Yahoo!?
| | Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
| | http://im.yahoo.com
| |
|
|