|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=koi8-r" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2614.3500" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#008080><STRONG><EM>Thanks for the info
Vitaly,</EM></STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#008080><STRONG><EM>Think Datek (sometimes also problems) is
perhaps better then Ameritrade</EM></STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#008080><STRONG><EM>( didnot experience the sort of problems
you had).</EM></STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#008080><STRONG><EM>Theo Lockefeer.</EM></STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>----- Original Message ----- </FONT>
<DIV><FONT size=2>From: Vitaly Larichev <<A
href="mailto:vitaly@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>vitaly@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>To: <<A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Sent: April 10, 2000 2:28 AM</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Subject: Re: Brokers : Amertrade expirience</FONT></DIV></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV><FONT size=2>> Theo,<BR>> <BR>> After having
Ameritrade's account for about 4 years, now I am considering to close it.
My<BR>> only, but big for me complaint is that confirmations are very slow -
typically more than<BR>> 1 hour (the last time when I placed orders with
Ameritrade was late last year, cannot say<BR>> if there are recent
improvements). Although I am not a daytrader, yet it means in practice<BR>> I
cannot correct my order - for quite a while you don't have a slightest idea if
it was<BR>> executed at all and at what price if it's at market.<BR>>
<BR>> Cheers, Vitaly<BR>> <BR>> P.S. Sorry, could not respond earlier
having problems with my ISP vs. Metastock List<BR>> server.<BR>> <BR>>
</FONT></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Tue Apr 11 10:37:00 2000
Return-Path: <majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from listserv.equis.com (listserv.equis.com [204.246.137.2])
by purebytes.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA14151
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 10:25:11 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA29446
for metastock-outgoing; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 10:28:15 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA29440
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 10:28:10 -0600
Received: from mail.rdc1.sfba.home.com (imail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [24.0.0.66])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA02174
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 10:39:51 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from home.com ([24.7.91.146]) by mail.rdc1.sfba.home.com
(InterMail v4.01.01.00 201-229-111) with ESMTP
id <20000411162347.ZNAQ27789.mail.rdc1.sfba.home.com@xxxxxxxx>
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 09:23:47 -0700
Message-ID: <38F351A4.CB5F5D8B@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 09:24:04 -0700
From: Larry <amernick@xxxxxxxx>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Continual charges
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
To Equis Support!
If that is an oxymoroon.
Continually charging our customers for the for bugs in your software is
a little less than ethical. Most software manufacturers publish patches
or fixes on their web sites. If the directions are clear and written in
lain English, there is no problem. I think you ought to rethink your new
policy. When version 7.0 was first advertised, Equis promised free fixes
for any bugs that developed.
Downloading patches or fixes online is a cheaper and more efficient
alternative than waiting for snail mail. From reading this forum, it is
apparent that you are not listening to the needs of your clients. No one
expects a free lunch but one doesn't want to be charged six times for
the same salami sandwhich.
|