|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2614.3500" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT color=#008080 face=Arial><STRONG><EM>Glen
:</EM></STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#008080 face=Arial><STRONG><EM>I agree ! (with
you).</EM></STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#008080 face=Arial><STRONG><EM>Theo
Lockefeer.</EM></STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>----- Original Message ----- </FONT>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>From: Glen Wallace <<A
href="mailto:gcwallace@xxxxxxxx";>gcwallace@xxxxxxxx</A>></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>To: MetaStock listserver <<A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Cc: MetaStock Support <<A
href="mailto:support@xxxxxxxxx";>support@xxxxxxxxx</A>></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Sent: April 11, 2000 6:32 PM</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Subject: Re: Continual charge for maintenance
releases???</FONT></DIV></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>> No, Lynn, that is not good
enough.<BR>> <BR>> Although I think it is highly unprofessional to require
your customers to pay<BR>> to fix your errors, my bigger concern is how you
expect us to discover when a<BR>> maintenance release has been issued
(Equis's participation on this list has<BR>> been inconsistent) and what the
release fixes (you still haven't answered my<BR>> question about whether the
maintenance release fixes the user resource leak in<BR>> MS Pro).<BR>>
<BR>> Come on. For a US$1,500 software application, I expect you,
Equis, to fix<BR>> your errors promptly and get the maintenance release to me
at *your* expense.<BR>> <BR>> Anybody disagree?<BR>> <BR>> <BR>>
----- Original Message -----<BR>> From: "Equis Support" <<A
href="mailto:support@xxxxxxxxx";>support@xxxxxxxxx</A>><BR>> To: <<A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR>>
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2000 8:06 AM<BR>> Subject: RE: Continual charge for
maintenance releases???<BR>> <BR>> > List,<BR>> ><BR>> > In
the past, the patches that we posted on the web site caused much more<BR>>
> headache to customers than it was worth. Many people were either
installing<BR>> > the wrong patch or multiple patches when they only
needed to run one of<BR>> > them, or there were people that had multiple
installations of the program<BR>> > and the patches sometimes failed to
update the program in the location that<BR>> > they expected, etc.<BR>>
> Installing the maintenance release from a CD will eliminate most of
these<BR>> > issues.Therefore it was decided that there will not be a
patch posted on the<BR>> > web site for versions 7.0x. The update will be
via CD only.<BR>> > The $9.00 charge for the 7.0x release includes the
cost of the CD,<BR>> > duplication and shipping anywhere in the
world. The cost will be determined<BR>> > at the time of the release
depending on if it is only a maintenance release<BR>> > or if there are
any enhancements to the software. If you have any further<BR>> > questions
on the upgrade cost, please contact our sales department at<BR>> >
800-882-3030 or 801-265-8886.<BR>> ><BR>> > Thank you,<BR>> >
Lynn<BR>> > Equis Support<BR>> > <<A
href="http://www.equis.com/";>http://www.equis.com/</A>><BR>> > <<A
href="http://www.equis.com/customer/support/";>http://www.equis.com/customer/support/</A>><BR>>
><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> > -----Original Message-----<BR>>
> From: Christian Baude [<A
href="mailto:BAUDECB@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>mailto:BAUDECB@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>]<BR>>
> Sent: Monday, April 10, 2000 7:54 PM<BR>> > To: <A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A><BR>> >
Subject: Re: Continual charge for maintenance releases???<BR>> ><BR>>
> On Mon, 10 Apr 2000 19:55:01 -0500, you wrote:<BR>> ><BR>> >
> I have just ordered the 7.01 maintenance release for MS Pro and was<BR>>
> > charged $9.00. Now do I have to pay again for release 7.02 and
on<BR>> > > and on and.....or will these fixes be posted to your
website. I don't<BR>> > > think we should have to keep paying everytime
Equis fixes an issue<BR>> > > in their software. Thanks for your
reply.<BR>> ><BR>> > Interesting question.<BR>> ><BR>> >
I just got the full EOD upgrade on a CD as v 7.02, I ASSYOUME the<BR>> >
patch from 7.xx to 7.02 was on the WEB.... I just checked, and they<BR>> >
are still on the 6.52 time frame.<BR>> ><BR>> > Equis is just too
busy at this time upgrading their followers, and<BR>> > making sure
everyone is please.<BR>> ><BR>> > Equis, I'm sure, being a good and
socially responsive software<BR>> > company, will release the patch to fix
minor unforeseen issues with<BR>> > customer's configuration, will be
posted on the WEB site in due time.<BR>> > <g><BR>> ><BR>>
> -÷ Chris ß ÷-<BR>> <BR>> </FONT></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Tue Apr 11 11:55:29 2000
Return-Path: <majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from listserv.equis.com (listserv.equis.com [204.246.137.2])
by purebytes.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA24677
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 11:49:43 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id LAA31412
for metastock-outgoing; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 11:59:17 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA31408
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 11:59:13 -0600
Received: from inbound.satyam.net.in ([202.144.76.6])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA02269
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 12:10:49 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from default (210.214.42.30) by inbound.satyam.net.in (NPlex 4.5.049)
id 38EFB34200055FA8 for metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 17:51:27 +0000
Message-ID: <001d01bfa3df$31d8f5c0$1e2ad6d2@xxxxxxx>
From: "Dr. R.BHANJA" <bhanjar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: System Testing Software
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 23:25:41 +0530
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0016_01BFA40D.40AA5CA0"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.2106.6"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Any one here can advice which would be a better
system testing software or a software which can call the detail reports of
Metastock System Tester and nalyse. I am not satisfied with this Metastock
System Tester as it has no facility to analyse the testing results of various
parameters like drawdown, average gain/loss, risk/reward ratio, POR at one go
for selecting a better parameter. For each parameter one has to go to the
details of the system report to find.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>BHANJA</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Tue Apr 11 11:55:33 2000
Return-Path: <majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from listserv.equis.com (listserv.equis.com [204.246.137.2])
by purebytes.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA24798
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 11:51:27 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id LAA31420
for metastock-outgoing; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 11:59:23 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA31416
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 11:59:19 -0600
Received: from inbound.satyam.net.in ([202.144.76.6])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA02270
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 12:10:55 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from default (210.214.42.30) by inbound.satyam.net.in (NPlex 4.5.049)
id 38EFB34200056023 for metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 17:52:35 +0000
Message-ID: <002201bfa3df$5a9aeb80$1e2ad6d2@xxxxxxx>
From: "Dr. R.BHANJA" <bhanjar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Money Management Stops
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 23:27:06 +0530
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
What will be your exit criteria if a trade goes against you.
Bhanja
-----Original Message-----
From: CRLeBeau@xxxxxxx <CRLeBeau@xxxxxxx>
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tuesday, April 11, 2000 4:24 PM
Subject: Re: Money Management Stops
In a message dated 4/10/00 9:30:14 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
grt@xxxxxxxxxxxx
writes:
<< We don’t use any stops in our trading which means that some bad trades
can
be very expensive. Stops will only mess up your system, unless you used
stops when systems testing. We don’t use stops in testing our system and we
don’t use any stops in trading it.
Just my opinion.
Guy >>
Sounds familiar.
"I have never used stops, even to bail myself out. Somehow, having a fixed
rule to exit provides my adversaries too great an advantage. " - Victor
Niederhoffer, from "The Education of a Speculator", page 376
Chuck LeBeau
|