[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Volume Moving Average Study



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

No I didn't do a volume test on these securities because they are all highly 
liquid - I follow the top 200 stocks in the ASX (mainly warrants) and to be 
in the ASX200 they have to pass a liquidity test.

But the point I didn't express very well Nicholas was you could perform your 
volume test as you described but instead of discarding the securities that 
fail the test keep them in another folder and continue to update them so 
that in the future if any show signs of life you can reinstate them 
instantly and the data will up to date. It means running through the 
Downloader an extra time each download.
But in the meantime your smaller folder with highly liquid securities will 
be leaner and meaner and easier and faster to manage...especially 
explorations.
Ian

>From: "Nicholas Kormanik" <nkormanik@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: RE: Volume Moving Average Study
>Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2000 20:58:11 -0600
>
>Ian writes, "I mainly use two other folders which have about 200 securities
>in each."
>
>Did those approximately 400 stocks in 'topstocks' and 'watchlist' have to
>clear a volume hurdle?
>
>What makes them all that different from the other 3,000 securities?
>
>Thanks,
>Nicholas
>

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com