|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2919.6307" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Would anyone care to share some good
references on neural network use in predicting stock prices? Especially
any specific applications. I'd also be interested in anyone's personal
experience in using ANN technology in the market. From what I've read in
introductory texts it almost sounds too good to be true.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Thanks</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Jeff</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><A
href="mailto:jhuck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>jhuck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Sat May 13 22:03:35 2000
Return-Path: <majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from listserv.equis.com (listserv.equis.com [204.246.137.2])
by purebytes.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA14354
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 13 May 2000 20:53:47 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id VAA03188
for metastock-outgoing; Sat, 13 May 2000 21:23:36 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA03185
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 13 May 2000 21:23:33 -0600
Received: from ksc15.th.com (ksc15.th.com [203.155.33.55])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA10033
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 13 May 2000 21:40:09 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from gayatri.pobox.com (l237ppp032.ksc.net.th [203.155.237.32])
by ksc15.th.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA08876
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 14 May 2000 10:21:16 +0700 (ICT)
Message-Id: <4.3.0.20000514100755.00cf8150@xxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Sender: abhaumik@xxxxxxxxxxx
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3
Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 10:19:52 +0700
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: "Ananda P. Bhaumik" <abhaumik@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Upgrade to MetaStock 7?
In-Reply-To: <20000513200138.7426.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
Dear list members
How come CMA got an offer for USd 115 and I got an offer for only Usd 59?
I wrote to Equis to explain but have not received a reply yet.
I have been a registered user of MS since version 1.0 and I agree that the
DOS version upto 4.0 (I skipped 4.5 and upgraded to the next version) was
great. But I like 6.52 too.
What I do not understand is that I was given an offer to upgrade for 800
odd Dollars late last year and then now it is USd 59.
Has Equis gone mad or is it the business practice of Reuters.
Equis under Achelis was as great company. If he is listening and he is
still in charge let him not get swayed by the business practices of the big
boys. They do not always know what is the best and what is right.
Reuters had tried very hard to dislodge Teletrac from the financial
institution trading rooms for many years with their product developed out
of Australia (I forget the name). They used to have heavy promotions and
give it away free. It did not work. I have seen MS RT running on Reuters.
It is ag ood product though I must say that their formula language still
does not have the power of Supercharts and the ease of Snap/Computrac now
known as Smartrader.
Coming back to the original issue, if Equis is listening, please let us
know why this discriminatory practice in pricing?
.
At 01:01 PM 5/13/00 -0700, you wrote:
>Just got the flyer for MS 7 upgrade for $115 including $15 shipping (who are
>they kidding, shipping is at most $4)
> The only major difference I can find between version 7 and 6.5 is the
> Data On
>Demand.
> Also I hardly ever used version 6.5 as only version 4.5 has the macros.
>Equis never figured out how to put the macros back into the product after
>version 4.5.
>Equis added bells and whistles but took out the basic essentials like AutoRun
>Macros, so the program got bigger and less useful.
> The flyer also implies you have to get data from Reuters Datalink and
> pay for
>it after a month. So what is the point of Data on Demand if you have to
>pay for
>the data on an ongoing basis.
>Is the data really on demand or do you have to maintain a paid subscription
>forever to keep the data "on demand?" Equis purposely leaves that unclear in
>the flyer.
> CMA
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
>http://im.yahoo.com/
|