|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
A.J. Maas:
You are not correct. You can run V 6.5 from one directory and v 7.0X from
another directory. Caution, do not try to use the same data files for both
programs. have a data folder in V 6.5, and a separate one in V 7.0x.
A.J. some of your postings remind me of a college prof I had many decades
ago. He taught fairly straightforward courses in surveying and engineering
astronomy. The problem was that he felt that the courses were too easy and
had to be made "challenging" for his students. Please don't challenge me,
please explain what you mean in simple terms. This is not a college
classroom and we are not competing for grades.
Lionel Issen
lissen@xxxxxxxxx
----- Original Message -----
From: Dan Cash <dcash@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, August 05, 2000 11:50 AM
Subject: Re: Potential huge DOWDiamond?!
> Ton,
>
> I am continually amazed at your astute ability to turn a simple discussion
into a snide and sarcastic exchange.
> I am not interested in using either i.e. or outlook especially when your
particular post type is the only time I
> experience this. I will just continue to delete them (and many others of
yours that you have not seen fit to run
> through a spell checker).
>
> You seem very knowledgeable, expert, and extremely bright, and at times
this is just not enough to trump your
> condescending attitude. There is more to life than being "right" all the
time. E.G. graciousness, kindness,
> politeness.
>
>
>
>
> "A.J. Maas" wrote:
>
> > Windows runs on 95% of the PC's in the world.
> > Internet Explorer on 80% of the PC's in the world, thus Outlook Express
on 80%.
> >
> > Now lets see the usage of the fast majority of loosers:
> > old-hat netscap and eudora and the likes.....15-3-2.
> > That makes that the minority is having problems, not the majority.
> >
> > Let's translate this over to MSK
> >
> > MSK 7.x and 6.x are the most current and update programs
> > MSK 4.x and 5.x are dying out, MSK 3..x for DOS and older will have all
fanished
> > and thus be the lessest used programs.
> >
> > Should members now, when posting also still have to make provisions
> > for the handfull of DOS 3.x and 5.x users? In Formula's, Explorations,
SysTests?
> > For those not whising to go modern?
> >
> > Come of it, stop whining and set your program settings right or better,
dump the user
> > unfriendly programs made by those loosers and start upgrading to a
modern-day software.
> > I think this is the Nth time over the past 3 years that quick and
effective solutions were
> > provide here, and still these immense impopular programs are+were the
causes of
> > giving users the same unfriendly errors.
> >
> > Fine programs they are indeed. Perhaps we should all go back to old DOS,
and
> > live pc-life in the dark ages again.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ton Maas
> > ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Dismiss the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying.
> > Homepage http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Dan Cash" <dcash@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: zaterdag 5 augustus 2000 5:55
> > Subject: Re: Potential huge DOWDiamond?!
> >
> > > Netscape is free, granted, not old, though. My life will not be the
lesser if I just delete. Your post is
> > > the only problem that I have such as this. Possibly you could make
some adjustment as it seems I am not
> > > the only one to experience this.
> > >
> > > Dan
> > >
> > > "A.J. Maas" wrote:
> > >
> > > > history repeats itselve...................................(see the
many prev mails on the html-subject)
> > > >
> > > > for years there have been html-compatible software packages around
> > > >
> > > > ships along freely (thus for FREE) with your OS
> > > >
> > > > (still +) AND UP TILL NOW, this as a particular judge, being part of
the white-collor-DOJ-mob,
> > > > and some blooper companies have recently tried to prevent this
> > > > (and see your now inconsistant reactions stemming from it for
results)
> > > >
> > > > also freely available too as seperate installable programs
> > > >
> > > > thus either, use the already FREE provided provision and upgrade to
modern software
> > > >
> > > > or, but not advisable for the painfull waiste, send bug-reports to
your old + out-dated
> > > > program providers and their too-lazy-and-therefore-being-loosers-too
manufacturers.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Ton Maas
> > > > ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > Dismiss the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying.
> > > > Homepage http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Dan Cash" <dcash@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Sent: vrijdag 4 augustus 2000 16:30
> > > > Subject: Re: Potential huge DOWDiamond?!
> > > >
> > > > > Well, I for one, am not edified.
> > > > >
> > > > > Dan
> > > > >
> > > > > "g.g." wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Here the same, with Eudora Pro 4.2.
> > >
> > >
>
|