[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Potential huge DOWDiamond?! BLOOPER of the year



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

I wrote; you need  2 sets of data, one in the V 6.5 folder  and referenced
by this program, the other in the V 7.0x folder and referenced by it.  If
you have one set of data folders and both v 6.5 and V 7.0x refer to the same
files, you will all kinds of errors, misreading of files and this message
that you posted.
Lionel Issen
lissen@xxxxxxxxx
----- Original Message -----
From: Chuck Engstrom <engstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, August 06, 2000 5:38 PM
Subject: Re: Potential huge DOWDiamond?! BLOOPER of the year


>
> Sorry I forgot the attachment 1st time.
>
>
>
>
>
> At 02:06 PM 08/06/2000 +0200, you wrote:
> >Lionell,
> >I wasn't expecting a low-level mail coming from a long-time Lister like
> yourselves. You
> >of all long timers, eh oldtimers(forgive me here) on this List, should
> have known a lot better.
> >(fresh in mem is still the debacle with the 6.5 --> 6.52 and 6.52a
endless
> line of bugged
> >Patches).
> >
> >On top of the Edge, in stead of below.
> >
> >It's the difference in writing sense or nonsense..................
> >Giving support is one, but giving the wrong support...................
> >Nothing teaching, educating or other ways of lecturing related, just
> writing plain sense.
> >And also distinguesing bewteen valuable info and (re)posted crab.
> >
> >F.e.:
> >
> >1. Where in my prev mail did you find the line saying that you canNOT run
> 6.52
> >    from 1 folder and 7.0x from another 2nd folder?
> >    Naturaly you can (max=1 instance at the time), and you can create
> unlimmeted
> >    installations................................but, however, what are
> the consequences?
> >
> >There wasn't also a mentioning that it is just PLAIN STUPID to have that
> type setup,
> >instead it was kept down to being BLOOPER of the year.
> >Explainations "as to why" were also fully included.
> >Nothing teaching, nothing lecturing, just a plain sensable practical
> solution for the
> >many problems that are bound to follow and that are bound to be posted
next.
> >
> >Replies to these types of nonsense discussions can be expected, if not,
> everyone is not
> >aware what kind of bullshit one writes + does get written here.
> >Whilst participating in such a discussion, it is also adding + sharing
> valueable valid &
> >true information, eg support, with and to others on the List. Something
> one also gets
> >explained (or lectured, whatever your fancy) on first time
List-subscribtion.
> >
> >2. What makes you think that you cannot use the same MSK Data Files,
> running either
> >    6.5x or 7.0x ?
> >    Set Up does not make any changes to the Data Files. Therefore too,
you
> can unlimmetly
>
>
> Have a look at the attached.
>
> Chuck Engstrom
>
>