[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RT] Nasdaq-100 and component parts,Connors Book


  • To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [RT] Nasdaq-100 and component parts,Connors Book
  • From: "Lionel Issen" <lissen@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 15:48:18 -0800
  • In-reply-to: <009901bf8f62$2aae5ba0$1d31bccc@xxxxxxx>

PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

paula:

What is the price of the disk, and what is your opinion of the book and the
disk?
Lionel Issen
lissen@xxxxxxxxx
----- Original Message -----
From: Paula <hotair003@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2000 12:25 PM
Subject: Re: [RT] Nasdaq-100 and component parts,Connors Book


> Hi: I have Connors Advanced Strategies. There are no Metastock formulas in
> it ,although the publisher offers software for Metastock which contains
code
> for most of the strategies.
> Paula
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Lionel Issen <lissen@xxxxxxx>
> To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2000 9:10 AM
> Subject: Re: [RT] Nasdaq-100 and component parts
>
>
> > Constance Brown has no formulas in her book.  She discusses methods. It
is
> a
> > good book, take a look at it.
> >
> > The book, Connors on Advanced Trading Strategies, might have some Equis
> > formulas in it.  I haven't seen the book, so I cant say for certain that
> > this is correct.  If anyone has seen this book, please let us know.
> > Lionel Issen
> > lissen@xxxxxxxxx
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: M. Robb <robb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2000 8:23 PM
> > Subject: Re: [RT] Nasdaq-100 and component parts
> >
> >
> > > Steve:
> > >
> > > You seem familiar with a number of TA books.  Would you recommend one
or
> > two
> > > that would be the best for learning how to design new indicators,
> > especially
> > > new oscillators, in Metastock language?
> > >
> > > Are Chande's books good for this.  Would C. Brown's latest book be
> better
> > > for writing in Metastock? Etc.
> > >
> > > Any comments you might have would indeed be appreciated.  Thank you.
> > >
> > > Mike
> > >
> > > P.S. I am trying to write Brown's RSI derivative oscillator in
Metastock
> > > from her tradestation formula with out success.
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Steve Karnish" <kernish@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: "Joe Frabosilio" <joe6964@xxxxxxxx>; <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> > > <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Friday, March 17, 2000 6:27 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [RT] Nasdaq-100 and component parts
> > >
> > >
> > > > Joe,
> > > >
> > > > I'm kinda new to equities, so I'm having trouble understanding how
> > > > oscillators can hurt me in this arena.  Started using momentum
> > oscillators
> > > > in 1975 for futures and thought they might work on the equity side.
I
> > > quess
> > > > this technical crap will never transfer to equity markets.  Should I
> now
> > > > bail out of my Nasdaq-100 future's contracts that I purchased this
> > > morning?
> > > > Also,  could you please advise on what I should do with these "dogs"
> > that
> > > I
> > > > purchased on the opening (AMCC, CTXS, CMVT, QLGC, SEBL, VRTS)?
> > > >
> > > > Take care,
> > > >
> > > > Steve Karnish
> > > > Cedar Creek Trading
> > > > http://www.cedarcreektrading.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: Joe Frabosilio <joe6964@xxxxxxxx>
> > > > To: Steve Karnish <kernish@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Cc: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2000 8:29 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: [RT] Nasdaq-100 and component parts
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Steve,
> > > > >
> > > > >     Now you can see why I don't use any Osciliators, they can hurt
> > real
> > > > > bad at times. But will agree on not following the non-trading
idots.
> > > > >
> > > > > TradeWell,
> > > > > Joe Frabosilio
> > > > >
> > > > > Steve Karnish wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >    Part 1.1    Type: Plain Text (text/plain)
> > > > > >            Encoding: quoted-printable
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>