|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Hi: I have Connors Advanced Strategies. There are no Metastock formulas in
it ,although the publisher offers software for Metastock which contains code
for most of the strategies.
Paula
----- Original Message -----
From: Lionel Issen <lissen@xxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2000 9:10 AM
Subject: Re: [RT] Nasdaq-100 and component parts
> Constance Brown has no formulas in her book. She discusses methods. It is
a
> good book, take a look at it.
>
> The book, Connors on Advanced Trading Strategies, might have some Equis
> formulas in it. I haven't seen the book, so I cant say for certain that
> this is correct. If anyone has seen this book, please let us know.
> Lionel Issen
> lissen@xxxxxxxxx
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: M. Robb <robb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2000 8:23 PM
> Subject: Re: [RT] Nasdaq-100 and component parts
>
>
> > Steve:
> >
> > You seem familiar with a number of TA books. Would you recommend one or
> two
> > that would be the best for learning how to design new indicators,
> especially
> > new oscillators, in Metastock language?
> >
> > Are Chande's books good for this. Would C. Brown's latest book be
better
> > for writing in Metastock? Etc.
> >
> > Any comments you might have would indeed be appreciated. Thank you.
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > P.S. I am trying to write Brown's RSI derivative oscillator in Metastock
> > from her tradestation formula with out success.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Steve Karnish" <kernish@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: "Joe Frabosilio" <joe6964@xxxxxxxx>; <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> > <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Friday, March 17, 2000 6:27 AM
> > Subject: Re: [RT] Nasdaq-100 and component parts
> >
> >
> > > Joe,
> > >
> > > I'm kinda new to equities, so I'm having trouble understanding how
> > > oscillators can hurt me in this arena. Started using momentum
> oscillators
> > > in 1975 for futures and thought they might work on the equity side. I
> > quess
> > > this technical crap will never transfer to equity markets. Should I
now
> > > bail out of my Nasdaq-100 future's contracts that I purchased this
> > morning?
> > > Also, could you please advise on what I should do with these "dogs"
> that
> > I
> > > purchased on the opening (AMCC, CTXS, CMVT, QLGC, SEBL, VRTS)?
> > >
> > > Take care,
> > >
> > > Steve Karnish
> > > Cedar Creek Trading
> > > http://www.cedarcreektrading.com
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Joe Frabosilio <joe6964@xxxxxxxx>
> > > To: Steve Karnish <kernish@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2000 8:29 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [RT] Nasdaq-100 and component parts
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hi Steve,
> > > >
> > > > Now you can see why I don't use any Osciliators, they can hurt
> real
> > > > bad at times. But will agree on not following the non-trading idots.
> > > >
> > > > TradeWell,
> > > > Joe Frabosilio
> > > >
> > > > Steve Karnish wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Part 1.1 Type: Plain Text (text/plain)
> > > > > Encoding: quoted-printable
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>
|