[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: === Looping constructs.



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links


What is it that you want to do in the system tester that you can't do
now?

Gary

-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Martinez [mailto:DanM@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2000 10:42 PM
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Equis Suggestion Box
Subject: Re: === Looping constructs.


I think Equis, for it's next MetaStock version, should have built-in VBA
support.  Also, MS should have a MS language converter for conversion to
VBA.
This way, experienced users can gradually move to VBA.  New users can
start
using VBA right away instead of learning MS.  VBA is becoming the
standard
language for users.  Even Corel is getting the message by including VBA
support
in their Office 2000.  While this may seem difficult, MicroSoft Word has
macro
AND VBA support.

Right now, we must buy an extra SDK, Power Basic or equivalent, figure
out how
to create DLL's and learn how to link them to MS.

About Traderware:  Something many on this List may not know.  Traderware
will
not work in Win9x.  You must use Win NT.  If you try to use Win9x, it
will
crash after about an hour.  Their salesman told me Win9x won't "return
system
resources" correctly.  I have never heard of this type of problem in
Win9x
before so it doesn't make much sense to me.  I doubt RadarScreen has
this
problem.

Daniel.



David Bozkurtian wrote:

> At the least, it should do these things. Not to mention simple flow
control
> and repeating structures such as For Loops, While, Select Case. What
about
> passing parameters to custom indicators?
>
> It is probably futile to expect these enhancements in the near future
from
> Equis. Any Developers/Traders out there interested in putting our
noggins
> together to create a shareable version of what we want?
>
> I know the folks at Traderware have a very interesting product (M
Brown, I
> know you are reading), but the last time I checked the cost was way
over my
> budget.
>
> Hopefully helpful folks like yourselves will not only identify the
problems
> facing technical analysts, but bring to the table real workable
solutions
> (preferably turnkey) to benefit the entire list.
> It's happening piecemeal now with people trading system, indicator,
expert,
> and explorer code. But still, you have to admit, that we are in the
dark
> ages.
>
> We have no accepted standards for measuring system effectiveness, no
> standards for stop rules. Looks like the whole field is still
evolving,
> which is a good thing. I continue to believe that the Internet and the
> sharing of ideas will revolutionize our field over the next few years.
It's
> an exiting time, and great to be part of this list group. I think
other
> agree that what some of us have learned on this list is not found in
print
> anywhere else, or at least not easy to come by.
>
> Thanks list.
>
> David
>
> From: "Kolade, Adeniyi" <adeniyi.kolade@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To: "'metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: === Looping constructs.
> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 16:14:01 -0000
>
> Hi all
>
> Do you not think that Equis should
>
> 1  Include looping constructs in the Metastock formula language
>
> and
>
> 2  Make the tiny screen area for programming in the Explorer, the
System
> Tester and the Expert Builder expandable to one page  at least
>
> Further can anyone tell me how to make the FFT function works in an
> exploration. I've tried it out but it returns N/A
>
> Thanks
> ade Kolade