[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Quotes conversion



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links


Al,

According to my own Year2000 data experience :

a) there was no Year2000 problem at all with Quote Plus Virtual,

b) there was apparently no serious Year2000 problem with the Metastock 
Output program run either MANUALLY (Start/Program/Quote Plus/Metastock 
Output) or by Quote Plus SCANS (ProcessMS command). The only annoying was 
the Equis Metastock/Downloader Open Directory dialogs showing 1900 instead 
of 2000, but, as I said, the historical price data was correct = ready for 
Metastock use. This 1900 "cosmetic" stuff was corrected by the first QP patch.

c) there were serious Year2000 problems with the Metastock directories 
auto-update (READ "AUTO") run by Quote Plus Downloader. The DoSplit (87) or 
10h exception errors at least. This was not completely repaired by the 
first QP patch. Get the latest one (see Gary Lyben instructions on Quote 
Plus site or Quote Plus e-mail list). The occurence of this problem has 
most probably put the Metastock database in a questionable state (clean 
rebuild by Metastock Output Tool might a good idea).

d) The latest patch "requires that your current qp_meta.exe program be 
dated 8-18-1999 or greater" [GL]. Your 6/21/99 build is too old, please 
request a new CD from Quote Plus (Janene <janene@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>).

e) All the above has never damaged your Quote Plus database. Only Metastock 
data are in question by c)

Alain

At 12:22 7/1/2000 -0600, Al Taglavore wrote:
>Alain and others:
>
>I have followed the posts on this Quotes Plus to MetaStock data conversion
>thread, and feel that I am missing some thing.  I have QP ver 2.1 with a
>6/21/99 build date for the qp_meta.exe file and if I am having a problem, I
>am not aware of the problem.  My data is handled with my new ver 6.52
>MetaStock program just as it was with ver 5.11.  My charts are correct and
>the data shows correctly on the datapane in the Downloader.
>
>Please enlighten my as to what problem I should be having.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Al Taglavore