PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2722.1300" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial><SPAN class=484165500-21111999>Marco,</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial><SPAN class=484165500-21111999>&nbsp;&nbsp; Wilder 
calculated all of his moving averages by a 'throw one out' method; 
</SPAN></FONT><FONT face=Arial><SPAN class=484165500-21111999>e.g., for RSI 
(14), i</SPAN></FONT><FONT face=Arial><SPAN class=484165500-21111999>f the price 
is up, the next UP value is 13/14 times the previous UP value plus 1/14 times 
today’s price change; and the next DN value is 13/14 times the previous DN 
value.&nbsp;</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial><SPAN class=484165500-21111999></SPAN></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial><SPAN class=484165500-21111999>&nbsp; You are thus 
actually calculating the EMA for 2*N -1 periods.&nbsp; You can compare the two 
in MS to verify that this is the case.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial><SPAN class=484165500-21111999></SPAN></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial><SPAN 
class=484165500-21111999>Bob<BR>&nbsp;</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><BR>
<P><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2>Bob Jagow</FONT><U></U> <BR><U><FONT 
color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2>bjagow@inreach.com</FONT></U> </P>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader><FONT face="Times New Roman" 
size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> 
owner-metastock@metastock.com [mailto:owner-metastock@metastock.com]<B>On 
Behalf Of</B> Marco<BR><B>Sent:</B> Friday, November 19, 1999 2:17 
PM<BR><B>To:</B> metastock@metastock.com<BR><B>Subject:</B> Wilder's smoothing 
indicator<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Hello,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>is there that can tell me how is calculated 
the Wilder's smoothing indicator included in Metastock 6.52? Which is the 
formual to calculate it? Is it explained in some TASC/Future&nbsp; 
magazine&nbsp; issue?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT><FONT color=#000000 size=2><FONT 
size=1><FONT size=2>Any help would be greately 
appreciated.</FONT></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2><FONT size=1><FONT 
size=2></FONT></FONT></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2><FONT size=1><FONT 
size=2>Regards</FONT></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2><FONT size=1><FONT 
size=2></FONT></FONT></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2><FONT size=1><FONT 
size=2>Marco</FONT></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2><FONT size=1><FONT size=2></FONT><FONT 
size=2>Italy</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>
<P>&nbsp;</P></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></FONT></FONT></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Thu Nov 25 16:53:03 1999
Return-Path: <majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from listserv.equis.com (listserv.equis.com [204.246.137.2])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA09460
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 20 Nov 1999 21:31:56 -0800
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id VAA09895
for metastock-outgoing; Sat, 20 Nov 1999 21:02:10 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA09892
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 20 Nov 1999 21:02:07 -0700
Received: from smtp.email.msn.com (cpimssmtpu01.email.msn.com [207.46.181.26])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA20413
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 20 Nov 1999 21:08:15 -0700 (MST)
Received: from tomcat - 63.10.214.239 by email.msn.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
Sat, 20 Nov 1999 19:53:08 -0800
From: "Bob Jagow" <bjagow@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Wilder's smoothing indicator
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 1999 19:53:20 -0800
Message-ID: <001201bf33d3$f3453ba0$c2058ed1@xxxxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0013_01BF3390.E5246CA0"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <000001bf332a$12463fe0$dbc41fc3@xxxxxx>
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status: RO
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2722.1300" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>Marco, </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial><SPAN class=421124803-21111999> My 1st try echoed
here full of RTF code, so am resending it.</SPAN><SPAN
class=421124803-21111999></SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial><SPAN class=421124803-21111999></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial><SPAN class=421124803-21111999>-----</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>Wilder calculated all of his moving averages by a 'throw
one out' method; e.g., for RSI (14), if the price is up, the next UP value is
13/14 times the previous UP value plus 1/14 times today’s price change; and the
next DN value is 13/14 times the previous DN value . </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>It thus actually calculates the EMA for 2*N -1 periods.
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>You can compare the two in MS to verify that this is the
case. </FONT></DIV>
<P><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2>Bob Jagow</FONT><U></U> <BR><U><FONT
color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2>bjagow@xxxxxxxxxxx</FONT></U> </P>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader><FONT face="Times New Roman"
size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B>
owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]<B>On
Behalf Of</B> Marco<BR><B>Sent:</B> Friday, November 19, 1999 2:17
PM<BR><B>To:</B> metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<BR><B>Subject:</B> Wilder's smoothing
indicator<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Hello,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>is there that can tell me how is calculated
the Wilder's smoothing indicator included in Metastock 6.52? Which is the
formual to calculate it? Is it explained in some TASC/Future
magazine issue?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT><FONT color=#000000 size=2><FONT
size=1><FONT size=2>Any help would be greately
appreciated.</FONT></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2><FONT size=1><FONT
size=2></FONT></FONT></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2><FONT size=1><FONT
size=2>Regards</FONT></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2><FONT size=1><FONT
size=2></FONT></FONT></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2><FONT size=1><FONT
size=2>Marco</FONT></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2><FONT size=1><FONT size=2></FONT><FONT
size=2>Italy</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>
<P> </P></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></FONT></FONT></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Thu Nov 25 16:52:46 1999
Return-Path: <majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from listserv.equis.com (listserv.equis.com [204.246.137.2])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA06656
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 20 Nov 1999 19:04:07 -0800
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id SAA08829
for metastock-outgoing; Sat, 20 Nov 1999 18:41:30 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA08826
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 20 Nov 1999 18:41:27 -0700
Received: from mail.rdc1.md.home.com (imail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [24.2.2.66])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA20348
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 20 Nov 1999 18:47:34 -0700 (MST)
Received: from cj52561a ([24.13.243.16]) by mail.rdc1.md.home.com
(InterMail v4.01.01.00 201-229-111) with SMTP
id <19991121013258.OCYU1970.mail.rdc1.md.home.com@xxxxxxxx>
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 20 Nov 1999 17:32:58 -0800
Message-ID: <000a01bf33d9$a3d183c0$10f30d18@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Jim Greening" <jimginva@xxxxxxxx>
To: "Metastock" <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Weekly Pick
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 1999 20:34:00 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0007_01BF3396.93F23BE0"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status: RO
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2614.3401" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV>All,</DIV>
<DIV> I missed last weeks pick since my local cable
company had some kind of problem last Saturday that resulted in me not being
able to get on the Internet until yesterday. I guess I'm going to have to
download one of those free internet providers software to use as a back up in
case I lose my fast cable connection again. Anyway, I'm back and have
decided that this weeks pick will be Ameritrade (AMTD).</DIV>
<DIV> <SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt">AMTD at 28 1/8 is starting a
normal pull back from a three-day 50% up move that broke a six-month
Intermediate Term Down Trend Channel (ITDTC) last Tuesday.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>I think the new Short Term Up Trend
Channel that I constructed from the late October low to Tuesday’s high with the
top at 33 5/8 and the bottom at 21 5/8 will hold and this should be a good entry
opportunity.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>AMTD set an all time
high of 62.79 on 4/14/99 before starting the ITDTC it just broke.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>I think there is a good chance it could
try to retest that high in the next few months.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>The Tema PV Binary wave is positive and
rising, which is bullish, but the Tema StochRSI 21 is falling from a high
positive value.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>I read that as a
bullish combination with the possibility of a few more days of pull back still
ahead.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>The fundamentals are OK for
an Internet broker with the price/sales a little on the high side at 18.27, the
debt/equity a low 0.17, revenues growing at a 63% annual rate, and earnings
expected to turn positive late next year.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>If I open a position, I’ll set the target just under the April high
at 60 and the stop just under the STUTC at 20 ¾.</SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt"> See
a chart at <A
href="http://www.geocities.com/jimginva/">http://www.geocities.com/jimginva/</A></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt"></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt">JimG<?xml:namespace prefix =
o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p></SPAN></DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt"> <o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Thu Nov 25 16:53:07 1999
Return-Path: <majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from listserv.equis.com (listserv.equis.com [204.246.137.2])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA11938
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 20 Nov 1999 23:44:34 -0800
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id XAA10350
for metastock-outgoing; Sat, 20 Nov 1999 23:20:27 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA10347
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 20 Nov 1999 23:20:24 -0700
Received: from slkcpop1.slkc.uswest.net (slkcpop1.slkc.uswest.net [206.81.128.1])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id XAA20463
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 20 Nov 1999 23:26:34 -0700 (MST)
Received: (qmail 23870 invoked by alias); 21 Nov 1999 06:08:48 -0000
Delivered-To: fixup-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx@fixme
Received: (qmail 23535 invoked by uid 0); 21 Nov 1999 06:08:31 -0000
Received: from pppdsla217.slkc.uswest.net (HELO Nicholas) (216.160.232.217)
by slkcpop1.slkc.uswest.net with SMTP; 21 Nov 1999 06:08:31 -0000
From: "Nicholas Kormanik" <nkormanik@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Ebay MetaStock Sale Question
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 1999 23:09:15 -0700
Message-ID: <LMBBKJCLKIJIBBJLAEIJOELKCLAA.nkormanik@xxxxxxxxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <004701bf334f$c23eed00$1464fea9@xxxxxx>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
Seeing my (slow) progress, my brother now wants a copy of MetaStock.
Someone earlier on this thread suggested looking over on Ebay. I did, and
found several copies of MetaStock 6.5 for sale starting at around $130 (and
then getting bid up a bit). I think one of these would make a nice
Christmas present for him.
My question is, if I buy one of these packages for him, will he be able to
register it, and be the official owner, so that he will be able to upgrade
to version 7.0, or whatever, if he wants to?
If what we're buying is just someone's past software after they've upgraded
to a newer version, and there is no accompanying registration, then I'd have
no interest in pursuing it. That probably wouldn't even be legal.
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Nicholas
|