|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I shouldn't be surprised to learn this deficiency has been posted to this list
before. I'm a fairly new member. Once about 2 years ago I got someone on the
line at Equis and tried to discuss this issue. It was clearly an example of being
unable to think outside the box. The box being defined by the lowest common
denominator of established technical analysis tools.
If Equis would start thinking in terms of Open Architecture instead of Predefined
Terms, they just might be able to leap into the market opportunity left open by bug
ridden bench of TradeStation's new releases. Is anybody listening?
Mark Scheier
"A.J. Maas" wrote:
> Like noted before on this list, I would also prefer to see
> a user definable Retracement Tool, replacing the irrelivant
> clumpsy Retracement-tool that is currently available in v6xx.
>
> For my preferences I would like to enable it to give lines @ the
> Decimal-levels (-0-12,5-25-33.3-50-66.7-75-87.5-100+112.5+125+
> 133.3+150 etc.), and having "optional" checkboxes (eg to switch
> some of the lines on and off, from time to time, for better chart readability).
>
> Regards,
> Ton Maas
> ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Dismiss the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying and
> note the new address change. Also for my Homepage
> http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: scheier <scheier@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: Metalist <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: dinsdag 7 september 1999 20:28
> Subject: Meta's fib tool
>
> > Concerning limitations of the Metastock fibonacci retracement
> > tool. It seems to use these levels: 68%, 50%, 38%, and 25% (75%
> > from the other end). Is anyone aware of way to user-modify this
> > tool?--as in a way to change the 75% to 78% etc. Has anyone
> > spoken to designers at Equis about bringing this tool up to date? --
> > with the work and software of Bryce Gilmore, Robert Miner, Tom
> > Joseph and about a half dozen other of their industry competitors?
> > --or is there maybe just a trick I'm unaware of in the latest or
> > soon-to-be released versions.
> >
> > Mark Scheier
> >
> >
|