[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Problem: "Sell three days after bought...."


  • To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: Problem: "Sell three days after bought...."
  • From: Wm Dean <wdjd@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 8 Sep 1999 08:05:12 -0700
  • In-reply-to: <LMBBKJCLKIJIBBJLAEIJKEMGCIAA.nkormanik@xxxxxxxxxx>

PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Go into system tester and then 'edit' your system.
Go to Stops...
Inactivity
Minimum change-10000
Periods  -  3 or whatever amount of days you want to exit


Von Hef wrote:
> 
>  Nicholas,
>    I have also dealt with this problem....here is what I usually do:
> For every condition that is used for an entry, I set as a binary signal,
> An example:
>                        "Bs1:=If(Cross(C,Mov(c,13,e)),
>                                   {then}1,
>                                   {else}0);"
> 
> I would do this for all 3 then use the following for an exit:
> 
>                         "BarsSince(Bs1=1)>=3 and BarsSince(Bs2=1)>=3 and
> BarsSince(Bs3=1)>=3"
> 
> Of course there are other ways to do this, I just used this example to spark
> your
> creative juices <g>.
> 
>   Adam Hefner
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Nicholas Kormanik <nkormanik@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 1999 3:39 AM
> Subject: Problem: "Sell three days after bought...."
> 
> >
> > Another plea for help....  In the System Tester, the enter long signal I'm
> > trying to study is actually a complicated **set** of signals.
> >
> > The exit long signal I want, just for testing purposes, is to "sell three
> > days after buying."
> >
> > Hey, folks, seems pretty simple, doesn't it?  But MetaStock wants to make
> > life difficult.
> >
> > If the enter long signal were one isolated indicator crossing, I could
> > simply use the ref(signal, +3), to exit the trade.  But....  I have a
> > complicated **set** of signals for entry, not one isolated indicator
> > crossing.
> >
> > Now, how about using ref(**set**, +3)?  Seems a simple solution.
> > Unfortunately, MetaStock doesn't apparently allow one to name a **set** of
> > indicators like that; instead the System Tester seems to want me to state
> > each sub-component separately, and do the ref(sub-signal, +??) for each.
> It
> > becomes really convoluted and messy.
> >
> > Do you folks have any help on this one?  Hopefully there's an easier way.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Nicholas
> >
> >