[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Optimal f and system optimization



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

I must have missed Ed Winter's posting(s).  Can somone rep[ost them or
email me?

Lionel Issen
----- Original Message -----
From: rudolf stricker <rst@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, July 17, 1999 11:05 AM
Subject: Optimal f and system optimization


>
> Optimizing 4 simple ROC-based systems for long/short positions in
> calls/puts for the DAX, I found that money management by Optimal f,
> like proposed in Futures Magazine 1992 (as posted here by Ed Winters;
> thanks again) does not lead automatically to the best results in terms
> of profit. This is, because imo system optimization and Optimal f
> calculation can not be seen as independent procedures, that can be
> done consecutively.
>
> Therefore, imo system optimization should not be done at f=1 (like
> implemented hard-wired in MetaStock) or at f=0 (like suggested by the
> Optimal f procedure posted here). The best choice should be to include
> f into the list of system parameters for optimization, and I'm ready
> to enter this line.
>
> Does anybody around here have similar experiences? Or did I get
> something wrong? - Any suggestions?
>
> mfg rudolf stricker
> | Disclaimer: The views of this user are strictly his own.
>