|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3616.1301"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Please scratch the request. I found what I
needed. I usually lose my address book and Mail when I go to an upgrade in
the browser. When I go to IE5 I will copy these to a floppy. Is
there any thing else I might lose? The Bookmarks seem to come through OK,
but I'll copy them anyway.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2><BR>Regards,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Bill Saxon<BR><A
href="mailto:bsaxon@xxxxxxxxxxx";>bsaxon@xxxxxxxxxxx</A>m</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><B>-----Original Message-----</B><BR><B>From:
</B>Bill Saxon <<A
href="mailto:bsaxon@xxxxxxxxxxxx";>bsaxon@xxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>To:
</B>Metastock, EMail List <<A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>Date:
</B>Monday, June 28, 1999 10:56 AM<BR><B>Subject: </B>Address
Book<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>In fooling around like a fool I lost my address
book entries. Can anyone give me the extension and where it is
located? I have a backup and presume I can restore. I also lost all
of my Inbox messages. Where is this on a backup?
Thanks.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2><BR>Regards,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Bill Saxon<BR><A
href="mailto:bsaxon@xxxxxxxxxxx";>bsaxon@xxxxxxxxxxx</A>m</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Mon Jun 28 13:19:23 1999
Return-Path: <majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from listserv.equis.com (listserv.equis.com [204.246.137.2])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA12748
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 13:05:22 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id NAA11887
for metastock-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 13:30:25 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA11884
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 13:30:23 -0600
Received: from smtp1.ncal.verio.com (smtp1.ncal.verio.com [207.20.246.161])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA12491
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 13:45:02 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from h204-247-101-216.ncal.verio.com (h204-247-101-216.ncal.verio.com [204.247.101.216])
by smtp1.ncal.verio.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id MAA21506
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:32:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by h204-247-101-216.ncal.verio.com with Microsoft Mail
id <01BEC162.3581B000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:31:56 -0700
Message-ID: <01BEC162.3581B000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Animal <animal@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "'metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Off topic OmniTrader - Was Re: CCI Spike
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 08:22:29 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="---- =_NextPart_000_01BEC162.358336A0"
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
I've tested formats with 2 and 4 digit years (i.e. 00,2000). Haven't had a problem with either.
-----Original Message-----
From: George Ashton [SMTP:golden1@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Sunday, June 27, 1999 10:35 PM
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Off topic OmniTrader - Was Re: CCI Spike
My data is still in the old format "AAA,990625,1.57,1.63,1.57,1.61,1459386"
is yours y2k format??
George.
At 18:43 26/06/1999 -0700, you wrote:
>I have no problems with OT 4.0 and MS 6.52
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: sayhow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [SMTP:sayhow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: Friday, June 25, 1999 6:47 PM
>To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: Off topic OmniTrader - Was Re: CCI Spike
>
>
>> OmniTrader not y2k compliant, is this for real?? I have just purchased a
>> copy and 6 months out from y2k I would expect it to be.
>>
>
>Geogre,
>
>OT cannot read metastock's Y2K data.
>
>FOO
>
>
>Foo Say How where when who why
>Singapura - the Lion City
>
Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\RE Off topic OmniTrader - Was 1"
|