|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Server would offer no advantage over Workstation, Joe.
Unless you have a reason such as wanting different data on the 3 boxes,
why not access the one set of data over your network -- 100mbs NICs and a
hub are dirt cheap?
[There are several programs to share the one connection.]
Bob
bjagow@xxxxxxx <mailto:bjagow@xxxxxxx>
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of joe zilaitis
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 1999 10:35 AM
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: win95 or winNT for multiple applications
Bob;
Thank you for the quick reply. I will be running 2-3 differnt set-ups, with
multiple monitors on each one.Should I go with WinNT Workstation or WinNT
Server 4.0? I would like to download all my data daily into all computers
simultaneously. Is this going to be possible?Thanks again. I only have one
ISP connection which is cable.
-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Jagow <bjagow@xxxxxxx>
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thursday, June 17, 1999 12:54 PM
Subject: RE: win95 or winNT for multiple applications
>You don't have much choice for the [populated] DUAL P2 400MHZ MB, Joe.
>Win9x doesn't support multiprocessors [2 are supported by Work Station and
>4+ by Enterprise].
> The resource problems will go away if you switch from win9x to NT;
>meanwhile, you can try tweaking '95 by specifying server in the system
>setup.
>
>Bob
>
>bjagow@xxxxxxx <mailto:bjagow@xxxxxxx>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of joe zilaitis
>Sent: Thursday, June 17, 1999 8:31 AM
>To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: win95 or winNT for multiple applications
>
>
>I am currently running WIN95 as a security trader and frequently have close
>to 20 applications(including the same browser) open at one time. I had
>started getting messages like system resources low, please close some
>applications, or just "out of memory". So I doubled RAM from 128M to 256M
>but that had no effect. Would changing over to winNT from win95 solve this
>problem? I recently purchased a DUAL P2 400MHZ MB hoping to solve the
>problem. Should I use win95 or winNT? Thank you.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Guy Tann <grt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Date: Thursday, June 17, 1999 5:16 AM
>Subject: RE: Faster MS Win 6.5 Explorations Using Cache???
>
>
>>Christian
>>
>>Let me know if you find it...
>>
>>Guy
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>>On Behalf Of Christian Baude
>>Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 1999 8:46 PM
>>To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>Subject: Re: Faster MS Win 6.5 Explorations Using Cache???
>>
>>On Wed, 16 Jun 1999 20:32:17 -0700, Guy wrote:
>>
>>>scratch area for calculations. In the WinDoze version, it appears that
>>they
>>>are using the hard disk for the scratch area (work area), and since I
have
>>
>>If someone knows where the scratch area is located, I may have a
>>solution (former TallTree systems Jet/RAMDISK user - I guess that
>>dates me <g>).
>>
>>C:\WINDOWS\TEMP ?
>>
>>-= Chris ß =-
>>Using MetaStock/FastTrack/FastRUBE/FastTools/EZPnF/TC2000/PSM
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
|