[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

changing y axis from fractions to decimal



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>

<META content="text/html; charset=x-user-defined" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content='"MSHTML 4.71.1712.3"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face=Arial size=2>If I am not mistaken, there is a way 
to change the viewing of the y axis(price) from fractions to 
decimal.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face=Arial size=2>Can someone tell me the 
procedure?&nbsp; Thank you.</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Thu Jun 17 09:32:12 1999
Received: from listserv.equis.com (204.246.137.2)
	by mail02.rapidsite.net (RS ver 1.0.4) with SMTP id 04983;
	Thu, 17 Jun 1999 12:18:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
	by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA18488
	for metastock-outgoing; Thu, 17 Jun 1999 10:00:13 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
	by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA18485
	for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 17 Jun 1999 10:00:11 -0600
Received: from smtp5.jps.net (smtp5.jps.net [209.63.224.55])
	by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA04854
	for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 17 Jun 1999 10:13:49 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from tomcat (209-142-55-188.stk.jps.net [209.142.55.188])
	by smtp5.jps.net (8.9.0/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA15415
	for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 17 Jun 1999 09:01:13 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Bob Jagow" <bjagow@xxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: win95 or winNT for multiple applications
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 09:00:15 -0700
Message-ID: <002201beb8da$7d55f840$0101a8c0@xxxxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0
In-Reply-To: <01beb8d6$57b45220$0101010a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
Importance: Normal
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by listserv.equis.com id KAB18488
X-Loop-Detect: 1
X-UIDL: ca14e0797d5a245806f99e7fc4772438.03

You don't have much choice for the [populated] DUAL P2 400MHZ MB, Joe.
Win9x doesn't support multiprocessors [2 are supported by Work Station and
4+ by Enterprise].
  The resource problems will go away if you switch from win9x to NT;
meanwhile, you can try tweaking '95 by specifying server in the system
setup.

Bob

bjagow@xxxxxxx <mailto:bjagow@xxxxxxx>


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of joe zilaitis
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 1999 8:31 AM
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: win95 or winNT for multiple applications


I am currently running WIN95 as a security trader and frequently have close
to 20 applications(including the same browser) open at one time. I had
started getting messages like system resources low, please close some
applications, or just "out of memory". So I  doubled RAM from 128M to 256M
but that had no effect. Would changing over to winNT from win95 solve this
problem? I recently purchased a DUAL P2 400MHZ MB hoping to solve the
problem. Should I use win95 or winNT? Thank you.
-----Original Message-----
From: Guy Tann <grt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thursday, June 17, 1999 5:16 AM
Subject: RE: Faster MS Win 6.5 Explorations Using Cache???


>Christian
>
>Let me know if you find it...
>
>Guy
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>On Behalf Of Christian Baude
>Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 1999 8:46 PM
>To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: Faster MS Win 6.5 Explorations Using Cache???
>
>On Wed, 16 Jun 1999 20:32:17 -0700, Guy wrote:
>
>>scratch area for calculations.  In the WinDoze version, it appears that
>they
>>are using the hard disk for the scratch area (work area), and since I have
>
>If someone knows where the scratch area is located, I may have a
>solution (former TallTree systems Jet/RAMDISK user - I guess that
>dates me <g>).
>
>C:\WINDOWS\TEMP  ?
>
>-= Chris ß =-
>Using MetaStock/FastTrack/FastRUBE/FastTools/EZPnF/TC2000/PSM
>
>
>